[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <476963d1-fc1a-b185-6b33-c780fbb009c5@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 12:03:59 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] bpf: annotate implicit fall through
On 14.01.2019 23:29, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> There is a plan to build the kernel with -Wimplicit-fallthrough and
> thise place in the code produced a warnings (W=1).
This?
> In this particular case change a ‘:’ with a ‘,’ so as to match the
> regular expression expected by GCC.
>
> This commit remove the following warning:
>
> net/core/filter.c:5310:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>
> ---
> net/core/filter.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 447dd1bad31f..c8069a142994 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -5309,7 +5309,7 @@ bpf_base_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
> case BPF_FUNC_trace_printk:
> if (capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> return bpf_get_trace_printk_proto();
> - /* else: fall through */
> + /* else, fall through */
The other patches seem to just drop "else:"...
> default:
> return NULL;
> }
>
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists