[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b0c40e9b-9c18-a8b0-c52b-0e6618eb7f9d@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:31:11 +0100
From: Andre Naujoks <nautsch2@...il.com>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-can@...r.kernel.org, lifeasageek@...il.com,
threeearcat@...il.com, syzkaller@...glegroups.com,
Kyungtae Kim <kt0755@...il.com>,
linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] can: bcm: check timer values before ktime conversion
Am 13.01.19 um 19:31 schrieb Oliver Hartkopp:
> Kyungtae Kim detected a potential integer overflow in bcm_[rx|tx]_setup()
> when the conversion into ktime multiplies the given value with NSEC_PER_USEC
> (1000).
>
> Reference: https://marc.info/?l=linux-can&m=154732118819828&w=2
>
> Add a check for the given tv_usec, so that the value stays below one second.
> Additionally limit the tv_sec value to a reasonable value for CAN related
> use-cases of 400 days and ensure all values to be positive.
>
> Reported-by: Kyungtae Kim <kt0755@...il.com>
> Tested-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
> Cc: linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org> # >= 2.6.26
Acked-by: Andre Naujoks <nautsch2@...il.com>
Sorry for the late reply, but I seem to have missed the initial send of
v2 of this. I wanted to at least ack it, since I made such a fuss about
the timeouts. :-)
Regards
Andre
> ---
> net/can/bcm.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
> index 0af8f0db892a..d4ae0a1471f3 100644
> --- a/net/can/bcm.c
> +++ b/net/can/bcm.c
> @@ -67,6 +67,9 @@
> */
> #define MAX_NFRAMES 256
>
> +/* limit timers to 400 days for sending/timeouts */
> +#define BCM_TIMER_SEC_MAX (400*24*60*60)
> +
> /* use of last_frames[index].flags */
> #define RX_RECV 0x40 /* received data for this element */
> #define RX_THR 0x80 /* element not been sent due to throttle feature */
> @@ -140,6 +143,22 @@ static inline ktime_t bcm_timeval_to_ktime(struct bcm_timeval tv)
> return ktime_set(tv.tv_sec, tv.tv_usec * NSEC_PER_USEC);
> }
>
> +/* check limitations for timeval provided by user */
> +static int bcm_is_invalid_tv(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head)
> +{
> + if ((msg_head->ival1.tv_sec < 0) ||
> + (msg_head->ival1.tv_sec > BCM_TIMER_SEC_MAX) ||
> + (msg_head->ival1.tv_usec < 0) ||
> + (msg_head->ival1.tv_usec >= USEC_PER_SEC) ||
> + (msg_head->ival2.tv_sec < 0) ||
> + (msg_head->ival2.tv_sec > BCM_TIMER_SEC_MAX) ||
> + (msg_head->ival2.tv_usec < 0) ||
> + (msg_head->ival2.tv_usec >= USEC_PER_SEC))
> + return 1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> #define CFSIZ(flags) ((flags & CAN_FD_FRAME) ? CANFD_MTU : CAN_MTU)
> #define OPSIZ sizeof(struct bcm_op)
> #define MHSIZ sizeof(struct bcm_msg_head)
> @@ -873,6 +892,10 @@ static int bcm_tx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg,
> if (msg_head->nframes < 1 || msg_head->nframes > MAX_NFRAMES)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /* check timeval limitations */
> + if ((msg_head->flags & SETTIMER) && bcm_is_invalid_tv(msg_head))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> /* check the given can_id */
> op = bcm_find_op(&bo->tx_ops, msg_head, ifindex);
> if (op) {
> @@ -1053,6 +1076,10 @@ static int bcm_rx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg,
> (!(msg_head->can_id & CAN_RTR_FLAG))))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /* check timeval limitations */
> + if ((msg_head->flags & SETTIMER) && bcm_is_invalid_tv(msg_head))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> /* check the given can_id */
> op = bcm_find_op(&bo->rx_ops, msg_head, ifindex);
> if (op) {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists