netdev - [PATCH bpf-next 3/6] samples: bpf: Extend RLIMIT_MEMLOCK for xdp_{sample_pkts, router

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190117010115.18234-4-maciejromanfijalkowski@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Jan 2019 02:01:12 +0100
From:   Maciej Fijalkowski <maciejromanfijalkowski@...il.com>
To:     daniel@...earbox.net, ast@...nel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com,
        brouer@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 3/6] samples: bpf: Extend RLIMIT_MEMLOCK for xdp_{sample_pkts, router_ipv4}

There is a common problem with xdp samples that happens when user wants
to run a particular sample and some bpf program is already loaded. The
default 64kb RLIMIT_MEMLOCK resource limit will cause a following error
(assuming that xdp sample that is failing was converted to libbpf
usage):

libbpf: Error in bpf_object__probe_name():Operation not permitted(1).
Couldn't load basic 'r0 = 0' BPF program.
libbpf: failed to load object './xdp_sample_pkts_kern.o'

Fix it in xdp_sample_pkts and xdp_router_ipv4 by setting RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
to RLIM_INFINITY.

Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciejromanfijalkowski@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
---
 samples/bpf/xdp_router_ipv4_user.c | 7 +++++++
 samples/bpf/xdp_sample_pkts_user.c | 7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdp_router_ipv4_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdp_router_ipv4_user.c
index cea2306f5ab7..c63c6beec7d6 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdp_router_ipv4_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdp_router_ipv4_user.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 #include <sys/syscall.h>
 #include "bpf_util.h"
 #include "bpf/libbpf.h"
+#include <sys/resource.h>
 
 int sock, sock_arp, flags = 0;
 static int total_ifindex;
@@ -609,6 +610,7 @@ static int monitor_route(void)
 
 int main(int ac, char **argv)
 {
+	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	struct bpf_prog_load_attr prog_load_attr = {
 		.prog_type	= BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
 	};
@@ -635,6 +637,11 @@ int main(int ac, char **argv)
 		ifname_list = (argv + 1);
 	}
 
+	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
+		perror("setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK)");
+		return 1;
+	}
+
 	if (bpf_prog_load_xattr(&prog_load_attr, &obj, &prog_fd))
 		return 1;
 
diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdp_sample_pkts_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdp_sample_pkts_user.c
index 8dd87c1eb560..5f5828ee0761 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdp_sample_pkts_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdp_sample_pkts_user.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <signal.h>
 #include <libbpf.h>
 #include <bpf/bpf.h>
+#include <sys/resource.h>
 
 #include "perf-sys.h"
 #include "trace_helpers.h"
@@ -99,6 +100,7 @@ static void sig_handler(int signo)
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
+	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	struct bpf_prog_load_attr prog_load_attr = {
 		.prog_type	= BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
 	};
@@ -114,6 +116,11 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		return 1;
 	}
 
+	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
+		perror("setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK)");
+		return 1;
+	}
+
 	numcpus = get_nprocs();
 	if (numcpus > MAX_CPUS)
 		numcpus = MAX_CPUS;
-- 
2.16.1