[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34EFBCA9F01B0748BEB6B629CE643AE60C9DDABB@DGGEMM533-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 01:40:51 +0000
From: wangyunjian <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
xudingke <xudingke@...wei.com>,
"bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Nkolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net v3] net: bridge: Fix ethernet header pointer before
check skb forwardable
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen@...workplumber.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 1:33 AM
> To: wangyunjian <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; xudingke <xudingke@...wei.com>;
> bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org; Nkolay Aleksandrov
> <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>; Roopa Prabhu
> <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] net: bridge: Fix ethernet header pointer before
> check skb forwardable
>
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 21:04:21 +0800
> wangyunjian <wangyunjian@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> > if (unlikely(netpoll_tx_running(to->br->dev))) {
> > + skb_push(skb, ETH_HLEN);
> > if (!is_skb_forwardable(skb->dev, skb)) {
> > kfree_skb(skb);
> > } else {
> > - skb_push(skb, ETH_HLEN);
> > br_netpoll_send_skb(to, skb);
> > }
> > return;
>
> The patch looks correct.
>
> On minor style issue is that after moving skb_push out of the if statement,
> both branches of the statement now contain a single line and therefore the
> brackets are no longer necessary. Suprised that checkpatch did not complain
> about this.
OK, I'll fix it and send the v4 later.
Thanks
Yunjian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists