[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9c1698dcf0ef40eb15035cfb32d9b3456f197d6.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:20:59 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sb1000: fix a couple of indentation issues
On Thu, 2019-01-17 at 00:13 +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> There is an if statement and a return statement that are incorrectly
> indented. Fix these.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/sb1000.c b/drivers/net/sb1000.c
[]
> @@ -540,12 +540,12 @@ sb1000_activate(const int ioaddr[], const char* name)
> if ((status = card_send_command(ioaddr, name, Command1, st)))
> return status;
> if (st[3] != 0xf1) {
> - if ((status = sb1000_start_get_set_command(ioaddr, name)))
> + if ((status = sb1000_start_get_set_command(ioaddr, name)))
Probably better to remove the assignment in the if at the same time.
status = sb1000_start_get_set_command(ioaddr, name);
if (status)
> return status;
> return -EIO;
> }
> udelay(1000);
> - return sb1000_start_get_set_command(ioaddr, name);
> + return sb1000_start_get_set_command(ioaddr, name);
> }
>
> /* get SB1000 firmware version */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists