netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/9] tools: bpftool: add basic probe capability, probe syscall availability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190116162828.75a42dcc@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:28:28 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/9] tools: bpftool: add basic probe
 capability, probe syscall availability

On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:21:11 +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> +tool for inspection of eBPF-related parameters for Linux kernel or net device
> +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Slight preference for s/eBPF/BPF/, the system call and /proc/ stuff is
all called bpf, not ebpf.

Also a question/nit here:

Does the rst2man tool care about the marking vs text length, here
dashes are longer than the actual text, people are fixing such
occurrences for Sphinx, I wonder if we should care?