[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <98dcd9de-f6c4-86d9-3ddc-4e3371d05cee@netronome.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:04:43 +0000
From: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/9] tools: bpftool: add probes for eBPF
program types
2019-01-17 10:27 UTC+0100 ~ Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> On 01/17/2019 01:42 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:21:14 +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote:
>>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
>>> index cd02cd4e2cc3..6355e4c80a86 100644
>>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
>>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
>>> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ LIBBPF_0.0.1 {
>>> bpf_object__unpin_maps;
>>> bpf_object__unpin_programs;
>>> bpf_perf_event_read_simple;
>>> + bpf_probe_prog_type;
>>
>> I think you have to start a new 0.0.2 section now, no?
>
> Yeah agree, 0.0.2 since this will go into a different kernel release
> than the current functions.
Oh I had not realised that, thanks. I'll fix and send v5.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists