lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <49E47F95-44F6-4A1E-8595-924EE40AF1A8@holtmann.org>
Date:   Fri, 18 Jan 2019 11:49:07 +0100
From:   Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc:     Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Dean Jenkins <Dean_Jenkins@...tor.com>,
        Bluez mailing list <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
        Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@...eaurora.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Dmitry Grinberg <dmitrygr@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Bluetooth: Fix locking in bt_accept_enqueue() for BH
 context

Hi Matthias,

> With commit e16337622016 ("Bluetooth: Handle bt_accept_enqueue() socket
> atomically") lock_sock[_nested]() is used to acquire the socket lock
> before manipulating the socket. lock_sock[_nested]() may block, which
> is problematic since bt_accept_enqueue() can be called in bottom half
> context (e.g. from rfcomm_connect_ind()):
> 
> [<ffffff80080d81ec>] __might_sleep+0x4c/0x80
> [<ffffff800876c7b0>] lock_sock_nested+0x24/0x58
> [<ffffff8000d7c27c>] bt_accept_enqueue+0x48/0xd4 [bluetooth]
> [<ffffff8000e67d8c>] rfcomm_connect_ind+0x190/0x218 [rfcomm]
> 
> Add a parameter to bt_accept_enqueue() to indicate whether the
> function is called from BH context, and acquire the socket lock
> with bh_lock_sock_nested() if that's the case.
> 
> Also adapt all callers of bt_accept_enqueue() to pass the new
> parameter:
> 
> - l2cap_sock_new_connection_cb()
>  - uses lock_sock() to lock the parent socket => process context
> 
> - rfcomm_connect_ind()
>  - acquires the parent socket lock with bh_lock_sock() => BH
>    context
> 
> - __sco_chan_add()
>  - called from sco_chan_add(), which is called from sco_connect().
>    parent is NULL, hence bt_accept_enqueue() isn't called in this
>    code path and we can ignore it
>  - also called from sco_conn_ready(). uses bh_lock_sock() to acquire
>    the parent lock => BH context
> 
> Fixes: e16337622016 ("Bluetooth: Handle bt_accept_enqueue() socket atomically")
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - use parameter in bt_accept_enqueue() to decide which lock to
>  acquire and adapt all callers
> - updated commit message
> ---
> include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h |  2 +-
> net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c      | 16 +++++++++++++---
> net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c        |  2 +-
> net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c       |  2 +-
> net/bluetooth/sco.c               |  2 +-
> 5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

patch has been applied to bluetooth-next tree.

Regards

Marcel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ