[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190118143503.3h2tv4fujl4w25mz@salvia>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:35:03 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: wenxu@...oud.cn, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] netfilter: nft_meta: Add NFT_META_I/OIFKIND meta type
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 03:32:08PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> wrote:
> > > + case NFT_META_IIFKIND:
> > > + if (in == NULL || in->rtnl_link_ops == NULL)
> > > + goto err;
> > > + strncpy((char *)dest, in->rtnl_link_ops->kind, IFNAMSIZ);
> >
> > It seems kind can be arbitrarily large, no limitation in its length.
>
> Its limited to 60 or 56 bytes it seems:
> char kind[MODULE_NAME_LEN];
>
> nla_strlcpy(kind, linfo[IFLA_INFO_KIND], sizeof(kind));
>
> (linkinfo_to_kind_ops in rtnetlink.c).
>
> > Thinking...
> >
> > There is no other way to identify a vft device rather than this
> > string? The only l3mdev that exists if vrf, right?
>
> There is, I suggested this more generic approach, as it would allow
> to create rules that match on the kind of device used (vrf, ppp, etc.).
Ah I see.
> If you think its too generic, ok.
I think it's fine, thanks for explaining.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists