netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 00/29] y2038: add time64 syscalls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Jan 2019 11:57:24 -0500
From:   Dennis Clarke <dclarke@...stwave.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, y2038@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     mattst88@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com,
        will.deacon@....com, tony.luck@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
        geert@...ux-m68k.org, monstr@...str.eu, paul.burton@...s.com,
        deller@....de, benh@...nel.crashing.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
        schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, dalias@...c.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, luto@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
        jcmvbkbc@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        deepa.kernel@...il.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
        firoz.khan@...aro.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/29] y2038: add time64 syscalls

On 1/18/19 11:18 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> This is a minor update of the patches I posted last week, I
> would like to add this into linux-next now, but would still do
> changes if there are concerns about the contents. The first
> version did not see a lot of replies, which could mean that
> either everyone is happy with it, or that it was largely ignored.
> 
> See also the article at https://lwn.net/Articles/776435/.

I would be happy to read "Approaching the kernel year-2038 end game"
however it is behind a pay wall.  Perhaps it may be best to just
host interesting articles about open source idea elsewhere.

Dennis Clarke