netdev - [PATCH net-next v2 11/14] net: ipv6: addrlabel: perform strict checks also for doit handlers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190118184626.24021-12-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Jan 2019 10:46:23 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...il.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 11/14] net: ipv6: addrlabel: perform strict checks also for doit handlers

Make RTM_GETADDRLABEL's doit handler use strict checks when
NETLINK_F_STRICT_CHK is set.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
---
 net/ipv6/addrlabel.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrlabel.c b/net/ipv6/addrlabel.c
index 0d1ee82ee55b..d43d076c98f5 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrlabel.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrlabel.c
@@ -523,6 +523,50 @@ static inline int ip6addrlbl_msgsize(void)
 		+ nla_total_size(4);	/* IFAL_LABEL */
 }
 
+static int ip6addrlbl_valid_get_req(struct sk_buff *skb,
+				    const struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
+				    struct nlattr **tb,
+				    struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+	struct ifaddrlblmsg *ifal;
+	int i, err;
+
+	if (nlh->nlmsg_len < nlmsg_msg_size(sizeof(*ifal))) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Invalid header for addrlabel get request");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (!netlink_strict_get_check(skb))
+		return nlmsg_parse(nlh, sizeof(*ifal), tb, IFAL_MAX,
+				   ifal_policy, extack);
+
+	ifal = nlmsg_data(nlh);
+	if (ifal->__ifal_reserved || ifal->ifal_flags || ifal->ifal_seq) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Invalid values in header for addrlabel get request");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	err = nlmsg_parse_strict(nlh, sizeof(*ifal), tb, IFAL_MAX,
+				 ifal_policy, extack);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	for (i = 0; i <= IFAL_MAX; i++) {
+		if (!tb[i])
+			continue;
+
+		switch (i) {
+		case IFAL_ADDRESS:
+			break;
+		default:
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Unsupported attribute in addrlabel get request");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int ip6addrlbl_get(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 			  struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
 {
@@ -535,8 +579,7 @@ static int ip6addrlbl_get(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 	struct ip6addrlbl_entry *p;
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 
-	err = nlmsg_parse(nlh, sizeof(*ifal), tb, IFAL_MAX, ifal_policy,
-			  extack);
+	err = ip6addrlbl_valid_get_req(in_skb, nlh, tb, extack);
 	if (err < 0)
 		return err;
 
-- 
2.19.2