[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190118045553.2774-1-atul.gupta@chelsio.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:55:53 -0800
From: Atul Gupta <atul.gupta@...lsio.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dt@...lsio.com
Cc: atul.gupta@...lsio.com
Subject: [net-next 1/3] net/tls: build_protos moved to common routine
build protos is required for tls_hw_prot also hence moved to
'tls_build_proto' and called as required from tls_init
and tls_hw_proto. This is required since build_protos
for v4 is moved from tls_register to tls_init in
commit <28cb6f1eaffdc5a6a9707cac55f4a43aa3fd7895>
Signed-off-by: Atul Gupta <atul.gupta@...lsio.com>
---
net/tls/tls_main.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_main.c b/net/tls/tls_main.c
index 78cb4a5..fc97a10 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_main.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_main.c
@@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ enum {
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(device_spinlock);
static struct proto tls_prots[TLS_NUM_PROTS][TLS_NUM_CONFIG][TLS_NUM_CONFIG];
static struct proto_ops tls_sw_proto_ops;
+static void build_protos(struct proto prot[TLS_NUM_CONFIG][TLS_NUM_CONFIG],
+ struct proto *base);
static void update_sk_prot(struct sock *sk, struct tls_context *ctx)
{
@@ -551,6 +553,32 @@ static struct tls_context *create_ctx(struct sock *sk)
return ctx;
}
+static void tls_build_proto(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ int ip_ver = sk->sk_family == AF_INET6 ? TLSV6 : TLSV4;
+
+ /* Build IPv6 TLS whenever the address of tcpv6 _prot changes */
+ if (ip_ver == TLSV6 &&
+ unlikely(sk->sk_prot != smp_load_acquire(&saved_tcpv6_prot))) {
+ mutex_lock(&tcpv6_prot_mutex);
+ if (likely(sk->sk_prot != saved_tcpv6_prot)) {
+ build_protos(tls_prots[TLSV6], sk->sk_prot);
+ smp_store_release(&saved_tcpv6_prot, sk->sk_prot);
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&tcpv6_prot_mutex);
+ }
+
+ if (ip_ver == TLSV4 &&
+ unlikely(sk->sk_prot != smp_load_acquire(&saved_tcpv4_prot))) {
+ mutex_lock(&tcpv4_prot_mutex);
+ if (likely(sk->sk_prot != saved_tcpv4_prot)) {
+ build_protos(tls_prots[TLSV4], sk->sk_prot);
+ smp_store_release(&saved_tcpv4_prot, sk->sk_prot);
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&tcpv4_prot_mutex);
+ }
+}
+
static int tls_hw_prot(struct sock *sk)
{
struct tls_context *ctx;
@@ -564,12 +592,15 @@ static int tls_hw_prot(struct sock *sk)
if (!ctx)
goto out;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&device_spinlock);
+ tls_build_proto(sk);
ctx->hash = sk->sk_prot->hash;
ctx->unhash = sk->sk_prot->unhash;
ctx->sk_proto_close = sk->sk_prot->close;
ctx->rx_conf = TLS_HW_RECORD;
ctx->tx_conf = TLS_HW_RECORD;
update_sk_prot(sk, ctx);
+ spin_lock_bh(&device_spinlock);
rc = 1;
break;
}
@@ -668,7 +699,6 @@ static void build_protos(struct proto prot[TLS_NUM_CONFIG][TLS_NUM_CONFIG],
static int tls_init(struct sock *sk)
{
- int ip_ver = sk->sk_family == AF_INET6 ? TLSV6 : TLSV4;
struct tls_context *ctx;
int rc = 0;
@@ -691,27 +721,7 @@ static int tls_init(struct sock *sk)
goto out;
}
- /* Build IPv6 TLS whenever the address of tcpv6 _prot changes */
- if (ip_ver == TLSV6 &&
- unlikely(sk->sk_prot != smp_load_acquire(&saved_tcpv6_prot))) {
- mutex_lock(&tcpv6_prot_mutex);
- if (likely(sk->sk_prot != saved_tcpv6_prot)) {
- build_protos(tls_prots[TLSV6], sk->sk_prot);
- smp_store_release(&saved_tcpv6_prot, sk->sk_prot);
- }
- mutex_unlock(&tcpv6_prot_mutex);
- }
-
- if (ip_ver == TLSV4 &&
- unlikely(sk->sk_prot != smp_load_acquire(&saved_tcpv4_prot))) {
- mutex_lock(&tcpv4_prot_mutex);
- if (likely(sk->sk_prot != saved_tcpv4_prot)) {
- build_protos(tls_prots[TLSV4], sk->sk_prot);
- smp_store_release(&saved_tcpv4_prot, sk->sk_prot);
- }
- mutex_unlock(&tcpv4_prot_mutex);
- }
-
+ tls_build_proto(sk);
ctx->tx_conf = TLS_BASE;
ctx->rx_conf = TLS_BASE;
update_sk_prot(sk, ctx);
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists