lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:51:03 -0800
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
To:     xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com
Cc:     Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
        Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mlx5: don't overwrite pedit action when multiple
 pedit used

On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 7:46 PM <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
>
> In some case, we may use multiple pedit actions to modify packets.
> The command shown as below: the last pedit action is effective.
>
> $ tc filter add dev netdev_rep parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1  \
>         flower skip_sw ip_proto icmp dst_ip 3.3.3.3                     \
>         action pedit ex munge ip dst set 192.168.1.100 pipe             \
>         action pedit ex munge eth src set 00:00:00:00:00:01 pipe        \
>         action pedit ex munge eth dst set 00:00:00:00:00:02 pipe        \
>         action csum ip pipe                                             \
>         action tunnel_key set src_ip 1.1.1.100 dst_ip 1.1.1.200 dst_port 4789 id 100 \
>         action mirred egress redirect dev vxlan0
>
> To fix it, we add max_mod_hdr_actions to mlx5e_tc_flow_parse_attr struct,
> max_mod_hdr_actions will store the max pedit action number we support and
> num_mod_hdr_actions indicates how many pedit action we used, and store all
> pedit action to mod_hdr_actions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
> ---

It is not clear to me whether this patch should go to net-next or net,
can you tag this patch and the other two then submit v2 while you
are addressing Or's comments.

Much appreciated,
Saeed.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ