netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/16] x86_64: bpf: implement jitting of JMP32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1548076553-31268-10-git-send-email-jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:15:46 -0500
From:   Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
To:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
        Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/16] x86_64: bpf: implement jitting of JMP32

This patch implements code-gen for new JMP32 instructions on x86_64.

Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
---
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 5542303..afabf59 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -881,20 +881,41 @@ xadd:			if (is_imm8(insn->off))
 		case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLT | BPF_X:
 		case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGE | BPF_X:
 		case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLE | BPF_X:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JEQ | BPF_X:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JNE | BPF_X:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JGT | BPF_X:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JLT | BPF_X:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JGE | BPF_X:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JLE | BPF_X:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSGT | BPF_X:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSLT | BPF_X:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSGE | BPF_X:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSLE | BPF_X:
 			/* cmp dst_reg, src_reg */
-			EMIT3(add_2mod(0x48, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x39,
-			      add_2reg(0xC0, dst_reg, src_reg));
+			if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP)
+				EMIT1(add_2mod(0x48, dst_reg, src_reg));
+			else if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
+				EMIT1(add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg));
+			EMIT2(0x39, add_2reg(0xC0, dst_reg, src_reg));
 			goto emit_cond_jmp;
 
 		case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSET | BPF_X:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSET | BPF_X:
 			/* test dst_reg, src_reg */
-			EMIT3(add_2mod(0x48, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x85,
-			      add_2reg(0xC0, dst_reg, src_reg));
+			if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP)
+				EMIT1(add_2mod(0x48, dst_reg, src_reg));
+			else if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
+				EMIT1(add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg));
+			EMIT2(0x85, add_2reg(0xC0, dst_reg, src_reg));
 			goto emit_cond_jmp;
 
 		case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSET | BPF_K:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSET | BPF_K:
 			/* test dst_reg, imm32 */
-			EMIT1(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg));
+			if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP)
+				EMIT1(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg));
+			else if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
+				EMIT1(add_1mod(0x40, dst_reg));
 			EMIT2_off32(0xF7, add_1reg(0xC0, dst_reg), imm32);
 			goto emit_cond_jmp;
 
@@ -908,8 +929,21 @@ xadd:			if (is_imm8(insn->off))
 		case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLT | BPF_K:
 		case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGE | BPF_K:
 		case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLE | BPF_K:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JEQ | BPF_K:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JNE | BPF_K:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JGT | BPF_K:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JLT | BPF_K:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JGE | BPF_K:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JLE | BPF_K:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSGT | BPF_K:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSLT | BPF_K:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSGE | BPF_K:
+		case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSLE | BPF_K:
 			/* cmp dst_reg, imm8/32 */
-			EMIT1(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg));
+			if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP)
+				EMIT1(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg));
+			else if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
+				EMIT1(add_1mod(0x40, dst_reg));
 
 			if (is_imm8(imm32))
 				EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xF8, dst_reg), imm32);
-- 
2.7.4