[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190121201213.4cb33c97@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 20:12:13 +0100
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
Cc: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>,
"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] i40e: replace switch-statement with
if-clause
On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:53:45 +0100
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com> wrote:
> > If that jump tables are a common problem, I wonder, why the compiler
> > cannot be adapted to generate better performing code or an option passed
> > to the compiler.
> >
>
> It might make sense to use -fno-jump-tables or a better value for the
> case-values-threshold param for the i40e code. However, doing that
> would require a much broader testing, since there are a number of
> different places where a switch-statement is used. And depending on
> the context, a jump table might still be a better option.
I recently found out that it is possible to disable GCC attributes per
function basis. See how I played with it here:
https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/blob/master/areas/dma/dma01_test_hellwig_direct_dma.org#investigate-overhead-of-bpf-indirect-retpoline
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists