lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190120190800.64814cd4@lwn.net> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 19:08:00 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Gal Pressman <galpress@...zon.com>, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>, xavier.huwei@...wei.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] coding-style: Clarify the expectations around bool On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:50:47 -0700 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca> wrote: > There has been some confusion since checkpatch started warning about bool > use in structures, and people have been avoiding using it. > > Many people feel there is still a legitimate place for bool in structures, > so provide some guidance on bool usage derived from the entire thread that > spawned the checkpatch warning. > > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFwVZk1OfB9T2v014PTAKFhtVan_Zj2dOjnCy3x6E4UJfA@mail.gmail.com > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> > Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> > Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org> > Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com> > Reviewed-by: Joey Pabalinas <joeypabalinas@...il.com> > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com> So this seems ready; I've applied it. Thanks, jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists