[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhRhEvcU804qMfZik7qwohuCDfcbvJMHRT+DxMPvvMDEGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:48:04 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Nazarov Sergey <s-nazarov@...dex.ru>
Cc: "linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"selinux@...r.kernel.org" <selinux@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel memory corruption in CIPSO labeled TCP packets processing.
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:35 PM Nazarov Sergey <s-nazarov@...dex.ru> wrote:
> 22.01.2019, 19:49, "Paul Moore" <paul@...l-moore.com>:
> >
> > Granted I'm looking at this rather quickly, so I may be missing
> > something, but why the changes to ip_options_compile()? Couldn't you
> > simply set opt->data manually (set the ptr) in cipso_v4_error() before
> > calling ip_options_compile() and arrive at the same result without
> > having to modify ip_options_compile()? I suppose there is the rtable
> > value to worry about, but ip_options_echo() should take care of that,
> > yes? No?
>
> ip_options_compile calls icmp_send, if someting wrong. So, we'll go back
> to trying to fix. ip_options_compile changes needed to avoid this.
Yes, exactly. If you don't pass the skb it shouldn't attempt to call
icmp_send() in case of error.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists