[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190123170454.GC30381@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:04:54 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: stable backport for the BPF speculation series? [was: Re: [PATCH
bpf v3 0/9] bpf fix to prevent oob under speculation]
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 03:36:54PM +0100, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 1:08 AM Alexei Starovoitov
> <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 12:58:26AM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > > This set fixes an out of bounds case under speculative execution
> > > by implementing masking of pointer alu into the verifier. For
> > > details please see the individual patches.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > v2 -> v3:
> > > - 8/9: change states_equal condition into old->speculative &&
> > > !cur->speculative, thanks Jakub!
> > > - 8/9: remove incorrect speculative state test in
> > > propagate_liveness(), thanks Jakub!
> > > v1 -> v2:
> > > - Typo fixes in commit msg and a comment, thanks David!
> >
> > Applied, Thanks
>
> This series and the followup fix ("bpf: fix sanitation of alu op with
> pointer / scalar type from different paths") have been in Linus' tree
> for six days, but from what I can tell, they aren't queued up for
> stable yet.
What are the git commit ids of the patches you think should be
backported?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists