lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190124172159.li2vci4zdeu3yrxp@davejwatson-mba.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:20:25 +0000
From:   Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>
To:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dave Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     Vakul Garg <vakul.garg@....com>,
        Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>,
        Aviad Yehezkel <aviadye@...lanox.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/7] net: tls: Set async_capable for tls zerocopy
 only if we see EINPROGRESS

Currently we don't zerocopy if the crypto framework async bit is set.
However some crypto algorithms (such as x86 AESNI) support async,
but in the context of sendmsg, will never run asynchronously.  Instead,
check for actual EINPROGRESS return code before assuming algorithm is
async.

Signed-off-by: Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>
---
 include/net/tls.h | 1 +
 net/tls/tls_sw.c  | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/tls.h b/include/net/tls.h
index 4592606e136a..eb73e62ac8c9 100644
--- a/include/net/tls.h
+++ b/include/net/tls.h
@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ struct tls_sw_context_tx {
 	struct list_head tx_list;
 	atomic_t encrypt_pending;
 	int async_notify;
+	int async_capable;
 
 #define BIT_TX_SCHEDULED	0
 	unsigned long tx_bitmask;
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index 0382a4674bb3..acfafe8190a3 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -673,6 +673,7 @@ static int tls_push_record(struct sock *sk, int flags,
 				tls_merge_open_record(sk, rec, tmp, orig_end);
 			}
 		}
+		ctx->async_capable = 1;
 		return rc;
 	} else if (split) {
 		msg_pl = &tmp->msg_plaintext;
@@ -814,8 +815,7 @@ int tls_sw_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size)
 	long timeo = sock_sndtimeo(sk, msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
 	struct tls_context *tls_ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
 	struct tls_sw_context_tx *ctx = tls_sw_ctx_tx(tls_ctx);
-	struct crypto_tfm *tfm = crypto_aead_tfm(ctx->aead_send);
-	bool async_capable = tfm->__crt_alg->cra_flags & CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC;
+	bool async_capable = ctx->async_capable;
 	unsigned char record_type = TLS_RECORD_TYPE_DATA;
 	bool is_kvec = iov_iter_is_kvec(&msg->msg_iter);
 	bool eor = !(msg->msg_flags & MSG_MORE);
-- 
2.17.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ