lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aeb75720-e18f-d10e-d38c-3753b2960131@netronome.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Jan 2019 08:55:41 +0000
From:   Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
To:     Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "oss-drivers@...ronome.com" <oss-drivers@...ronome.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/9] tools: bpftool: add probes for eBPF
 program types

2019-01-23 23:44 UTC+0000 ~ Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>
> Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com> [Thu, 2019-01-17 07:28 -0800]:
>> Introduce probes for supported BPF program types in libbpf, and call it
>> from bpftool to test what types are available on the system. The probe
>> simply consists in loading a very basic program of that type and see if
>> the verifier complains or not.
>>
>> Sample output:
>>
>>      # bpftool feature probe kernel
>>      ...
>>      Scanning eBPF program types...
>>      eBPF program_type socket_filter is available
>>      eBPF program_type kprobe is available
>>      eBPF program_type sched_cls is available
>>      ...
>>
>>      # bpftool --json --pretty feature probe kernel
>>      {
>>          ...
>>          "program_types": {
>>              "have_socket_filter_prog_type": true,
>>              "have_kprobe_prog_type": true,
>>              "have_sched_cls_prog_type": true,
>>              ...
>>          }
>>      }
> 
> Hi Quentin,
> 
> Awesome work! I wondef if you have plan to add similar functionality for
> attach types?
> 
> For example BPF_CGROUP_INET{4,6}_CONNECT were added in 4.17 but
> BPF_CGROUP_UDP{4,6}_SENDMSG later in 4.18 even though they correspond to
> same prog type (BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR).

Hi Andrey, thanks! And yeah adding probes for the attach types would be 
one of the next logical steps, although to be honest it is not at the 
top of my to-do list right now. I'll probably add them eventually, but 
if you have a need for such probes today feel free to give it a go!

Best regards,
Quentin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ