netdev - Re: [PATCH 6/8] power: reset: at91-reset: add support for sam9x60 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a74956fc-6085-eec2-c1b8-ed116b2297d8@microchip.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Jan 2019 10:34:50 +0000
From:   <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>
To:     <sre@...nel.org>
CC:     <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] power: reset: at91-reset: add support for sam9x60 SoC

Hi Sebastian,

On 23/01/2019 at 19:34, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:57:42AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Add support for additional reset causes and the proper compatibility
>> string for sam9x60 SoC. The restart function is the same as the samx7.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c b/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c
>> index f44a9ffcc2ab..44ca983a49a1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c
>> +++ b/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c
>> @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ enum reset_type {
>>   	RESET_TYPE_WATCHDOG	= 2,
>>   	RESET_TYPE_SOFTWARE	= 3,
>>   	RESET_TYPE_USER		= 4,
>> +	RESET_TYPE_CPU_FAIL	= 6,
>> +	RESET_TYPE_XTAL_FAIL	= 7,
>> +	RESET_TYPE_ULP2		= 8,
> 
> what happened to 5? :)

That a good question ;-)

It's marked as "Reserved"... which opens up a whole new field of 
speculation :-)

[..]

>>   	{ .compatible = "atmel,samx7-rstc", .data = samx7_restart },
>> +	{ .compatible = "microchip,sam9x60-rstc", .data = samx7_restart },
>>   	{ /* sentinel */ }
>>   };
>>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, at91_reset_of_match);
> 
> Patch looks fine to me. But I will wait a bit with merging, so that
> Alexandre or Ludovic have a chance to provide feedback.

What about merging this patch with the whole series through the at91 
then arm-soc trees?

Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre