lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <a74956fc-6085-eec2-c1b8-ed116b2297d8@microchip.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 10:34:50 +0000 From: <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com> To: <sre@...nel.org> CC: <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] power: reset: at91-reset: add support for sam9x60 SoC Hi Sebastian, On 23/01/2019 at 19:34, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:57:42AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> Add support for additional reset causes and the proper compatibility >> string for sam9x60 SoC. The restart function is the same as the samx7. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com> >> --- >> drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c | 13 +++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c b/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c >> index f44a9ffcc2ab..44ca983a49a1 100644 >> --- a/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c >> +++ b/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c >> @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ enum reset_type { >> RESET_TYPE_WATCHDOG = 2, >> RESET_TYPE_SOFTWARE = 3, >> RESET_TYPE_USER = 4, >> + RESET_TYPE_CPU_FAIL = 6, >> + RESET_TYPE_XTAL_FAIL = 7, >> + RESET_TYPE_ULP2 = 8, > > what happened to 5? :) That a good question ;-) It's marked as "Reserved"... which opens up a whole new field of speculation :-) [..] >> { .compatible = "atmel,samx7-rstc", .data = samx7_restart }, >> + { .compatible = "microchip,sam9x60-rstc", .data = samx7_restart }, >> { /* sentinel */ } >> }; >> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, at91_reset_of_match); > > Patch looks fine to me. But I will wait a bit with merging, so that > Alexandre or Ludovic have a chance to provide feedback. What about merging this patch with the whole series through the at91 then arm-soc trees? Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists