[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190124014527.kb7gpsrvz2zh2jhv@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 17:45:29 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: suppress readelf stderr when
probing for BTF support
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 09:24:35AM -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> Before:
> $ make -s -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> readelf: Error: Missing knowledge of 32-bit reloc types used in DWARF
> sections of machine number 247
> readelf: Warning: unable to apply unsupported reloc type 10 to section
> .debug_info
> readelf: Warning: unable to apply unsupported reloc type 1 to section
> .debug_info
> readelf: Warning: unable to apply unsupported reloc type 10 to section
> .debug_info
>
> After:
> $ make -s -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> index 70229de510f5..ff3cab5525c1 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ BTF_PAHOLE_PROBE := $(shell $(BTF_PAHOLE) --help 2>&1 | grep BTF)
> BTF_OBJCOPY_PROBE := $(shell $(LLVM_OBJCOPY) --help 2>&1 | grep -i 'usage.*llvm')
> BTF_LLVM_PROBE := $(shell echo "int main() { return 0; }" | \
> $(CLANG) -target bpf -O2 -g -c -x c - -o ./llvm_btf_verify.o; \
> - readelf -S ./llvm_btf_verify.o | grep BTF; \
> + readelf -S ./llvm_btf_verify.o 2>/dev/null | grep BTF; \
> /bin/rm -f ./llvm_btf_verify.o)
Silencing the warning may hide real issue later.
I'd rather fix whatever is necessary in readelf.
Does it use bfd? if so bpf support for bfd was practically complete.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists