lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <0aeb9b66-e370-28e9-4fce-c9061104d4b9@iogearbox.net> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 12:53:06 +0100 From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> To: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: stable backport for the BPF speculation series? [was: Re: [PATCH bpf v3 0/9] bpf fix to prevent oob under speculation] On 01/23/2019 06:12 PM, Jann Horn wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 6:04 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 03:36:54PM +0100, Jann Horn wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 1:08 AM Alexei Starovoitov >>> <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 12:58:26AM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote: >>>>> This set fixes an out of bounds case under speculative execution >>>>> by implementing masking of pointer alu into the verifier. For >>>>> details please see the individual patches. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> v2 -> v3: >>>>> - 8/9: change states_equal condition into old->speculative && >>>>> !cur->speculative, thanks Jakub! >>>>> - 8/9: remove incorrect speculative state test in >>>>> propagate_liveness(), thanks Jakub! >>>>> v1 -> v2: >>>>> - Typo fixes in commit msg and a comment, thanks David! >>>> >>>> Applied, Thanks >>> >>> This series and the followup fix ("bpf: fix sanitation of alu op with >>> pointer / scalar type from different paths") have been in Linus' tree >>> for six days, but from what I can tell, they aren't queued up for >>> stable yet. >> >> What are the git commit ids of the patches you think should be >> backported? > > Daniel Borkmann said at > https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=154820859831443&w=2 : > > | Will get this to stable towards end of week. We wanted to let this sit > | for a while in Linus' tree given the complexity of the fix to get some > | more coverage. We also need 9d5564ddcf2a ("bpf: fix inner map masking > |to prevent oob under speculation") in addition. > > , so I expect that he's going to submit a request for stable inclusion > in the next few days. The git commits are: Yep, correct.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists