lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190125070754.GA11152@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Jan 2019 08:07:54 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     maowenan <maowenan@...wei.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, stable@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable 4.4 05/11] ip: use rb trees for IP frag queue.

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 09:50:35AM +0800, maowenan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2019/1/25 1:58, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:19:40AM +0800, Mao Wenan wrote:
> >> From: Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>
> >>
> >> [ Upstream commit fa0f527358bd900ef92f925878ed6bfbd51305cc ]
> > 
> > This commit is not in the 4.14.y tree, any specific reason why not?
> 
> I found the commit 6b921536f1707a240e6f53843f1f26231016fda5 net: sk_buff rbnode reorg  in v4.14.y
> including the fixes.

Yes, that commit is really bffa72cf7f9d ("net: sk_buff rbnode reorg"),
which is upstream in 4.14.15 and 4.15.  But fa0f527358bd ("ip: use rb
trees for IP frag queue.") is not in 4.14 at all, it showed up in
4.9.134 and 4.19.  Why did the 4.14 tree not need it and 4.9 and 4.4
does?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ