netdev - [PATCH 03/10] xfrm: policy: increment xfrm_hash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190125074426.31053-4-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Jan 2019 08:44:19 +0100
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 03/10] xfrm: policy: increment xfrm_hash_generation on hash rebuild

From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>

Hash rebuild will re-set all the inexact entries, then re-insert them.
Lookups that can occur in parallel will therefore not find any policies.

This was safe when lookups were still guarded by rwlock.
After rcu-ification, lookups check the hash_generation seqcount to detect
when a hash resize takes place.  Hash rebuild missed the needed increment.

Hash resizes and hash rebuilds cannot occur in parallel (both acquire
hash_resize_mutex), so just increment xfrm_hash_generation, like resize.

Fixes: a7c44247f704e3 ("xfrm: policy: make xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype lockless")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 628b389af2ba..d8fba27a4bfb 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -1235,6 +1235,7 @@ static void xfrm_hash_rebuild(struct work_struct *work)
 	} while (read_seqretry(&net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.lock, seq));
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
+	write_seqcount_begin(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
 
 	/* make sure that we can insert the indirect policies again before
 	 * we start with destructive action.
@@ -1334,6 +1335,7 @@ static void xfrm_hash_rebuild(struct work_struct *work)
 
 out_unlock:
 	__xfrm_policy_inexact_flush(net);
+	write_seqcount_end(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&hash_resize_mutex);
-- 
2.17.1