netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] netlink: reduce NLA_POLICY_NESTED{,

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c3b87e72436aaae24facd2d329982ef09b9a60df.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Fri, 25 Jan 2019 20:34:57 +0100
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netlink: reduce NLA_POLICY_NESTED{,_ARRAY}
 arguments

On Fri, 2019-01-25 at 11:04 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> 
> > Dave, it looks like we're the only users of this right now,
> > so let me know if you'd prefer I take it through my tree.
> > Also, this conflicts with the fix I just made to the place
> > where I got it wrong, but obviously the resolution is to
> > just take the version without the maxattr argument.
> 
> Please take it through your tree in that case.  It'll probably
> be the more painless way to merge this.

Will do. The most painless would be if you'd merge net into net-next,
then I could pull net-next into mac80211-next and resolve the conflict
before I even apply the patch. In fact, I think either way I'll just
wait until you do that, I suppose you will eventually anyway?

johannes