netdev - [RFC PATCH 4/6] net/sched: act_ct: add support for force flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <b12a84a87b983d2bdbe710147f5aef5c98ed54db.1548285996.git.mleitner@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:32:33 -0200
From:   Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>
To:     Guy Shattah <sguy@...lanox.com>,
        Marcelo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>,
        Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>,
        John Hurley <john.hurley@...ronome.com>,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
        Justin Pettit <jpettit@....org>,
        Gregory Rose <gvrose8192@...il.com>,
        Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>,
        Flavio Leitner <fbl@...hat.com>,
        Florian Westphal <fwestpha@...hat.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Rashid Khan <rkhan@...hat.com>,
        Sushil Kulkarni <sukulkar@...hat.com>,
        Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>,
        Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>,
        Yossi Kuperman <yossiku@...lanox.com>,
        Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
        Rony Efraim <ronye@...lanox.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 4/6] net/sched: act_ct: add support for force flag

OvS ct action has this 'force' flag, which basically forces ConnTrack to
consider that this packet, this specific direction, is the original one.

Implement that similarly: if the ct entry is there and the direction is not
the expected one, destroy it and create a new one.

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>
---
 include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_ct.h |  1 +
 net/sched/act_ct.c                | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_ct.h b/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_ct.h
index 37b95cda1dedd283b0244a03a20860ba22966dfa..009e53ee83fb3125bc5c4ca86954af3bf6a0287a 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_ct.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_ct.h
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ enum {
 
 enum {
 	TC_CT_COMMIT,
+	TC_CT_FORCE,
 	__TC_CT_MAX
 };
 #define TC_CT_MAX (__TC_CT_MAX - 1)
diff --git a/net/sched/act_ct.c b/net/sched/act_ct.c
index f69509954149a0c8be710916a5289a4448049b5d..8a1b5d6a7cd8360c50011d992368464db213a020 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
@@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ static int tcf_ct_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
 		      struct tcf_result *res)
 {
 	struct tcf_ct *p = to_tcf_ct(a);
+	enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo;
 	struct nf_hook_state state = {
 		.hook = NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING,
 	};
@@ -173,6 +174,8 @@ static int tcf_ct_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
 	int action, err;
 	int nh_ofs;
 
+	/* Again needs to be here because we need a new ref on the ct. */
+again:
 	spin_lock(&p->tcf_lock);
 
 	tcf_lastuse_update(&p->tcf_tm);
@@ -218,8 +221,19 @@ static int tcf_ct_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
 	if (err != NF_ACCEPT)
 		goto drop;
 
-	new_ct = (struct nf_conn *)skb_nfct(skb);
+	new_ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
 	if (new_ct) {
+		/* Force conntrack entry direction. */
+		if (flags & BIT(TC_CT_FORCE) &&
+		    CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo) != IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL) {
+			if (nf_ct_is_confirmed(new_ct))
+				nf_ct_delete(new_ct, 0, 0);
+
+			nf_conntrack_put(&new_ct->ct_general);
+			nf_ct_set(skb, NULL, 0);
+			goto again;
+		}
+
 		if (mark_mask) {
 			new_ct->mark = (new_ct->mark &~ mark_mask) | (mark & mark_mask);
 			if (nf_ct_is_confirmed(new_ct))
-- 
2.20.1