netdev - [PATCH stable 4.4 v2 02/11] ip: discard IPv4 datagrams with overlapping segments.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1548384524-174152-3-git-send-email-maowenan@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:48:35 +0800
From:   Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>
To:     <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        <edumazet@...gle.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <maowenan@...wei.com>,
        <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH stable 4.4 v2 02/11] ip: discard IPv4 datagrams with overlapping segments.

From: Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit 7969e5c40dfd04799d4341f1b7cd266b6e47f227 ]

This behavior is required in IPv6, and there is little need
to tolerate overlapping fragments in IPv4. This change
simplifies the code and eliminates potential DDoS attack vectors.

Tested: ran ip_defrag selftest (not yet available uptream).

Suggested-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>
---
 include/uapi/linux/snmp.h |  1 +
 net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c    | 71 +++++++++++++----------------------------------
 net/ipv4/proc.c           |  1 +
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h b/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h
index 25a9ad8..9de808e 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ enum
 	IPSTATS_MIB_ECT1PKTS,			/* InECT1Pkts */
 	IPSTATS_MIB_ECT0PKTS,			/* InECT0Pkts */
 	IPSTATS_MIB_CEPKTS,			/* InCEPkts */
+	IPSTATS_MIB_REASM_OVERLAPS,		/* ReasmOverlaps */
 	__IPSTATS_MIB_MAX
 };
 
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
index 7291565..4e64879 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
@@ -342,6 +342,7 @@ static int ip_frag_reinit(struct ipq *qp)
 /* Add new segment to existing queue. */
 static int ip_frag_queue(struct ipq *qp, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
+	struct net *net = container_of(qp->q.net, struct net, ipv4.frags);
 	struct sk_buff *prev, *next;
 	struct net_device *dev;
 	unsigned int fragsize;
@@ -422,60 +423,22 @@ static int ip_frag_queue(struct ipq *qp, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	}
 
 found:
-	/* We found where to put this one.  Check for overlap with
-	 * preceding fragment, and, if needed, align things so that
-	 * any overlaps are eliminated.
+	/* RFC5722, Section 4, amended by Errata ID : 3089
+	 *                          When reassembling an IPv6 datagram, if
+	 *   one or more its constituent fragments is determined to be an
+	 *   overlapping fragment, the entire datagram (and any constituent
+	 *   fragments) MUST be silently discarded.
+	 *
+	 * We do the same here for IPv4.
 	 */
-	if (prev) {
-		int i = (FRAG_CB(prev)->offset + prev->len) - offset;
-
-		if (i > 0) {
-			offset += i;
-			err = -EINVAL;
-			if (end <= offset)
-				goto err;
-			err = -ENOMEM;
-			if (!pskb_pull(skb, i))
-				goto err;
-			if (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY)
-				skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
-		}
-	}
-
-	err = -ENOMEM;
+	/* Is there an overlap with the previous fragment? */
+	if (prev &&
+	    (FRAG_CB(prev)->offset + prev->len) > offset)
+		goto discard_qp;
 
-	while (next && FRAG_CB(next)->offset < end) {
-		int i = end - FRAG_CB(next)->offset; /* overlap is 'i' bytes */
-
-		if (i < next->len) {
-			/* Eat head of the next overlapped fragment
-			 * and leave the loop. The next ones cannot overlap.
-			 */
-			if (!pskb_pull(next, i))
-				goto err;
-			FRAG_CB(next)->offset += i;
-			qp->q.meat -= i;
-			if (next->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY)
-				next->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
-			break;
-		} else {
-			struct sk_buff *free_it = next;
-
-			/* Old fragment is completely overridden with
-			 * new one drop it.
-			 */
-			next = next->next;
-
-			if (prev)
-				prev->next = next;
-			else
-				qp->q.fragments = next;
-
-			qp->q.meat -= free_it->len;
-			sub_frag_mem_limit(qp->q.net, free_it->truesize);
-			kfree_skb(free_it);
-		}
-	}
+	/* Is there an overlap with the next fragment? */
+	if (next && FRAG_CB(next)->offset < end)
+		goto discard_qp;
 
 	FRAG_CB(skb)->offset = offset;
 
@@ -522,6 +485,10 @@ found:
 	skb_dst_drop(skb);
 	return -EINPROGRESS;
 
+discard_qp:
+	ipq_kill(qp);
+	err = -EINVAL;
+	IP_INC_STATS(net, IPSTATS_MIB_REASM_OVERLAPS);
 err:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
 	return err;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/proc.c b/net/ipv4/proc.c
index 3abd9d7..55545d0 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/proc.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/proc.c
@@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ static const struct snmp_mib snmp4_ipextstats_list[] = {
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("InECT1Pkts", IPSTATS_MIB_ECT1PKTS),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("InECT0Pkts", IPSTATS_MIB_ECT0PKTS),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("InCEPkts", IPSTATS_MIB_CEPKTS),
+	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("ReasmOverlaps", IPSTATS_MIB_REASM_OVERLAPS),
 	SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL
 };
 
-- 
1.8.3.1