netdev - [PATCH stable 4.4 v2 09/11] net: ipv4: do not handle duplicate fragments as overlapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1548384524-174152-10-git-send-email-maowenan@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:48:42 +0800
From:   Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>
To:     <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        <edumazet@...gle.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <maowenan@...wei.com>,
        <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH stable 4.4 v2 09/11] net: ipv4: do not handle duplicate fragments as overlapping

From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>

[ Upstream commit ade446403bfb79d3528d56071a84b15351a139ad ]

Since commit 7969e5c40dfd ("ip: discard IPv4 datagrams with overlapping
segments.") IPv4 reassembly code drops the whole queue whenever an
overlapping fragment is received. However, the test is written in a way
which detects duplicate fragments as overlapping so that in environments
with many duplicate packets, fragmented packets may be undeliverable.

Add an extra test and for (potentially) duplicate fragment, only drop the
new fragment rather than the whole queue. Only starting offset and length
are checked, not the contents of the fragments as that would be too
expensive. For similar reason, linear list ("run") of a rbtree node is not
iterated, we only check if the new fragment is a subset of the interval
covered by existing consecutive fragments.

v2: instead of an exact check iterating through linear list of an rbtree
node, only check if the new fragment is subset of the "run" (suggested
by Eric Dumazet)

Fixes: 7969e5c40dfd ("ip: discard IPv4 datagrams with overlapping segments.")
Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>
---
 net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
index 61f4216..500dfdd 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
@@ -400,10 +400,10 @@ static int ip_frag_queue(struct ipq *qp, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	struct net *net = container_of(qp->q.net, struct net, ipv4.frags);
 	struct rb_node **rbn, *parent;
 	struct sk_buff *skb1, *prev_tail;
+	int ihl, end, skb1_run_end;
 	struct net_device *dev;
 	unsigned int fragsize;
 	int flags, offset;
-	int ihl, end;
 	int err = -ENOENT;
 	u8 ecn;
 
@@ -473,7 +473,9 @@ static int ip_frag_queue(struct ipq *qp, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	 *   overlapping fragment, the entire datagram (and any constituent
 	 *   fragments) MUST be silently discarded.
 	 *
-	 * We do the same here for IPv4 (and increment an snmp counter).
+	 * We do the same here for IPv4 (and increment an snmp counter) but
+	 * we do not want to drop the whole queue in response to a duplicate
+	 * fragment.
 	 */
 
 	/* Find out where to put this fragment.  */
@@ -497,13 +499,17 @@ static int ip_frag_queue(struct ipq *qp, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		do {
 			parent = *rbn;
 			skb1 = rb_to_skb(parent);
+			skb1_run_end = FRAG_CB(skb1)->offset +
+				       FRAG_CB(skb1)->frag_run_len;
 			if (end <= FRAG_CB(skb1)->offset)
 				rbn = &parent->rb_left;
-			else if (offset >= FRAG_CB(skb1)->offset +
-						FRAG_CB(skb1)->frag_run_len)
+			else if (offset >= skb1_run_end)
 				rbn = &parent->rb_right;
-			else /* Found an overlap with skb1. */
-				goto discard_qp;
+			else if (offset >= FRAG_CB(skb1)->offset &&
+				 end <= skb1_run_end)
+				goto err; /* No new data, potential duplicate */
+			else
+				goto discard_qp; /* Found an overlap */
 		} while (*rbn);
 		/* Here we have parent properly set, and rbn pointing to
 		 * one of its NULL left/right children. Insert skb.
-- 
1.8.3.1