netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] selftests: bpf: break up test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190126055528.r3xvfgtazdf44ab6@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Jan 2019 21:55:30 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc:     daniel@...earbox.net, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] selftests: bpf: break up test_verifier

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 03:24:41PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> The tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c file is
> way too large, and since most people add their at the
> end of the list it's very prone to conflicts.
> 
> Break it up in the simplest possible way - slice the
> array up into smaller C files and include them in the
> right spot.
> 
> Tested:
> $ make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
> $ cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ ; make
> 
> v2:
> 
> The indentation is reduced further as discussed and lines folded.
> The conversion was scripted, and double checked by hand.

Looks great to me, but even first patch conflicts too much to apply.
Please respin one more time.
Thanks!