[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190126062120.pzb4jw2rzv6o5jp3@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 22:21:22 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: daniel@...earbox.net, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] selftests: bpf: break up test_verifier
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:17:28PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 21:55:30 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 03:24:41PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > The tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c file is
> > > way too large, and since most people add their at the
> > > end of the list it's very prone to conflicts.
> > >
> > > Break it up in the simplest possible way - slice the
> > > array up into smaller C files and include them in the
> > > right spot.
> > >
> > > Tested:
> > > $ make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
> > > $ cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ ; make
> > >
> > > v2:
> > >
> > > The indentation is reduced further as discussed and lines folded.
> > > The conversion was scripted, and double checked by hand.
> >
> > Looks great to me, but even first patch conflicts too much to apply.
> > Please respin one more time.
>
> I could have sworn when I pulled bpf-next this morning Jiong's patches
> were in it ;) I'll rebase/repost tomorrow morning.
They were ;) until they were pulled off.
Any order is fine.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists