lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 26 Jan 2019 13:17:18 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
        lifeasageek@...il.com, threeearcat@...il.com,
        syzkaller@...glegroups.com, nautsch2@...il.com,
        Kyungtae Kim <kt0755@...il.com>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [stable pre-4.8] can: bcm: check timer values before
 ktime conversion

On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 10:08:42AM +0100, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>Kyungtae Kim detected a potential integer overflow in bcm_[rx|tx]_setup()
>when the conversion into ktime multiplies the given value with NSEC_PER_USEC
>(1000).
>
>Reference: https://marc.info/?l=linux-can&m=154732118819828&w=2
>
>Add a check for the given tv_usec, so that the value stays below one second.
>Additionally limit the tv_sec value to a reasonable value for CAN related
>use-cases of 400 days and ensure all values to be positive.
>
>This patch is the pre-4.8 version of upstream commit 93171ba6f1deffd8

I can't find this commit id upstream, there's nothing with the same
subject name, nor does this code exist upstream. What's going on?

--
Thanks,
Sasha

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ