netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] qed*: Error recovery process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 27 Jan 2019 10:17:29 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     mkalderon@...vell.com
Cc:     michal.kalderon@...ium.com, ariel.elior@...ium.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] qed*: Error recovery process

From: Michal Kalderon <mkalderon@...vell.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 13:42:35 +0000

>> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 3:37 AM
>> 
>> > Parity errors might happen in the device's memories due to momentary
>> > bit flips which are caused by radiation.
>> > Errors that are not correctable initiate a process kill event, which
>> > blocks the device access towards the host and the network, and a
>> > recovery process is started in the management FW and in the driver.
>> >
>> > This series adds the support of this process in the qed core module
>> > and in the qede driver (patches 2 & 3).
>> > Patch 1 in the series revises the load sequence, to avoid PCI errors
>> > that might be observed during a recovery process.
>> 
>> Series applied.
> 
> Thanks Dave, though I don't see this in net-next, I noticed this was recently applied
> and reverted from net, should I resend to have it applied to net-next ? 

Yes it was my mistake, please resubmit and please integrate the follow-up fix that
was posted as well.

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1030545/