netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] mv88e6xxx DSA suspend to RAM support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190127.194440.2287944704136477403.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Sun, 27 Jan 2019 19:44:40 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     andrew@...n.ch
Cc:     miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
        gregory.clement@...tlin.com, antoine.tenart@...tlin.com,
        maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com, nadavh@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] mv88e6xxx DSA suspend to RAM support

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 22:46:52 +0100

> I think you are replying to the wrong patch? This comment fits to
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg546662.html

I noticed that right after I hit send, you are right.

Sorry for the confusion.

> Although i don't like it, i think for the moment we are going to have
> to accept the proposed fix.

Indeed.