netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2-next] Introduce ip-brctl shell script

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJieiUj9q-YsyKv3SOHKkfipCJyeZtxMFY7KFE+dBgih10s-6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 27 Jan 2019 21:08:13 -0800
From:   Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:     Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
Cc:     Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>,
        Eric Garver <egarver@...hat.com>,
        Tomas Dolezal <todoleza@...hat.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@....org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next] Introduce ip-brctl shell script

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 2:05 AM Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Roopa,
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 08:33:27 -0800
> Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 7:09 AM Nikolay Aleksandrov
> > <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > IMO the effort should be towards improving iproute2 to be
> > > easier to use and more intuitive. We should be pushing people to
> > > use the new tools instead of trying to find workarounds to keep the
> > > old tools alive. I do like to idea of deprecating bridge-utils, but
> > > I think it should be done via improving ip/bridge enough to be
> > > pleasant to use. We will have to maintain this compatibility layer
> > > forever if it gets accepted and we'll never get rid of brctl this
> > > way.
> >
> > +1, we should move people away from brtcl. there is enough confusion
> > among users looking at bridge attributes.,
> >
> > ip -d link show
> > bridge -d link show
> > brctl
>
> Why is this confusing? One can simply pick the most appropriate tool.
>
> > Adding a 4th one  to the list is not going to ease the confusion.
>
> Why do you say I'm adding a fourth (I guess) tool? I'm replacing the
> third one.

I know. But the first two commands were supposed to replace the third
one already.
and they should be. So, I think its better to fix the first two
instead of introducing another one.

>
> > We should try to make the 'ip -d link show and bridge -d link show'
> > outputs better. Any suggestions there from people will be useful.
>
> To be honest, I don't see any problem with them -- they just do
> different things.

Can we extend 'bridge' tool with extra options to provide a summary
view of all bridges like brctl ?
Its supposed to be the netlink based tool for all bridging and hence
could be a good replacement for all brctl users.