netdev - Re: [PATCH V2] net: i825xx: replace dev_kfree_skb_irq bydev_consume_skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190128020340.GC4765@lunn.ch>
Date:   Mon, 28 Jan 2019 03:03:40 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     yang.wei9@....com.cn
Cc:     albin_yang@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] net: i825xx: replace dev_kfree_skb_irq
 bydev_consume_skb_irq

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 09:50:42AM +0800, yang.wei9@....com.cn wrote:
> > It is normal to include here, under the ---, what has changed since
> > the previous version of the patch.
> >
> > Please also read
> >
> > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/networking/netdev-FAQ.html
> >
> > Your patches don't have the correct subject.
> 
> Hi Andrew
> 
> The previous patch (as follow) is wrong, so I submit a new and named V2.
> Please reject the previous patch.
> 
> net: i825xx: replace dev_kfree_skb_irq by dev_consume_skb_irq
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1031590/
> 
> The original suject in patch is as follow, but it be truncated due to return character.
> I have changed it, make the suject in one line. Do I need to resubmit it?

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/networking/netdev-FAQ.html#q-how-do-i-indicate-which-tree-net-vs-net-next-my-patch-should-be-in

	Andrew