lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 29 Jan 2019 09:59:03 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
        daniel@...earbox.net, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...hat.com,
        will.deacon@....com, Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        jannh@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/9] bpf: introduce bpf_spin_lock

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 01:37:12PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 09:43:10AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> > Isn't that still broken? AFAIU networking progs can happen in task
> > context (TX) and SoftIRQ context (RX), which can nest.
> 
> Sure. sendmsg side of networking can be interrupted by napi receive.
> Both can have bpf progs attached at different points, but napi won't run
> when bpf prog is running, because bpf prog disables preemption.

Disabling preemption is not sufficient, it needs to have done
local_bh_disable(), which isn't unlikely given this is all networking
code.

Anyway, if you're sure that's all good, I'll trust you on that. It's
been a very _very_ long time since I looked at the networking code.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ