netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/7] sh_eth: offload RX checksum on R7S72100

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:37:38 +0300
From:   Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:     Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] sh_eth: offload RX checksum on R7S72100

Hello!

On 01/29/2019 11:00 AM, Simon Horman wrote:

>>>> The RZ/A1H (R7S721000) SoC manual describes the Ether MAC's RX checksum
>>>> offload the same way as it's implemented in the EtherAVB MACs...
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
>>>
>>> Regarding this and the remaining patches in this series,
>>> which add rx-csum offload support in the sh_eth driver for
>>> various SoCs: has this been tested?
>>
>>    As I said, I've only tested it on R8A77980.

   And still hoping Geert would be able to test on R8A7740.

> 
> Thanks, I missed that.
> 
> As you may have guessed the implication of my question is that
> IMHO it would be best only to add this feature to SoCs where
> it has been tested.

   You don't trust the manuals? :-)

MBR, Sergei