netdev - Re: marvell 6190 NAT performance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190129145636.GL4765@lunn.ch>
Date:   Tue, 29 Jan 2019 15:56:36 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Marek Behún <marek.behun@....cz>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: marvell 6190 NAT performance

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 03:27:34PM +0100, Marek Behún wrote:
> Hi Florian,
> I've made a screenshot of perf top when doing the NAT throughput test
> without the switch (which too doesn't work on 1000mbps as I thought,
> but on ~680 mbps). What do you think about the result?
> 
> http://blackhole.sk/~kabel/tmp/a3700_nat_perf.png

Hi Marek

This is plain text, you can just cut/paste it into the email.

What you actually want to do is a side by side comparison of this and
the case where it does go through the switch. What are the big
changes?

	Andrew