lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 30 Jan 2019 20:59:16 +1100
From:   Peter Ceiley <peter@...ley.net>
To:     Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc:     Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: r8169 Driver - Poor Network Performance Since Kernel 4.19

Hi Heiner,

I tried disabling the ASPM using the pcie_aspm=off kernel parameter
and this made no difference.

I tried compiling the 4.18.16 r8169.c with the 4.19.18 source and
subsequently loaded the module in the running 4.19.18 kernel. I can
confirm that this immediately resolved the issue and access to the NFS
shares operated as expected.

I presume this means it is an issue with the r8169 driver included in
4.19 onwards?

To answer your last questions:

Base Board Information
    Manufacturer: Alienware
    Product Name: 0PGRP5
    Version: A02

... and yes, the RTL8168 is the onboard network chip.

Regards,

Peter.

On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 17:44, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> I think the vendor driver doesn't enable ASPM per default.
> So it's worth a try to disable ASPM in the BIOS or via sysfs.
> Few older systems seem to have issues with ASPM, what kind of
> system / mainboard are you using? The RTL8168 is the onboard
> network chip?
>
> Rgds, Heiner
>
>
> On 29.01.2019 07:20, Peter Ceiley wrote:
> > Hi Heiner,
> >
> > Thanks, I'll do some more testing. It might not be the driver - I
> > assumed it was due to the fact that using the r8168 driver 'resolves'
> > the issue. I'll see if I can test the r8169.c on top of 4.19 - this is
> > a good idea.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Peter.
> >
> > On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 17:16, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Peter,
> >>
> >> at a first glance it doesn't look like a typical driver issue.
> >> What you could do:
> >>
> >> - Test the r8169.c from 4.18 on top of 4.19.
> >>
> >> - Check whether disabling ASPM (/sys/module/pcie_aspm) has an effect.
> >>
> >> - Bisect between 4.18 and 4.19 to find the offending commit.
> >>
> >> Any specific reason why you think root cause is in the driver and not
> >> elsewhere in the network subsystem?
> >>
> >> Heiner
> >>
> >>
> >> On 28.01.2019 23:10, Peter Ceiley wrote:
> >>> Hi Heiner,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for getting back to me.
> >>>
> >>> No, I don't use jumbo packets.
> >>>
> >>> Bandwidth is *generally* good, and iperf results to my NAS provide
> >>> over 900 Mbits/s in both circumstances. The issue seems to appear when
> >>> establishing a connection and is most notable, for example, on my
> >>> mounted NFS shares where it takes seconds (up to 10's of seconds on
> >>> larger directories) to list the contents of each directory. Once a
> >>> transfer begins on a file, I appear to get good bandwidth.
> >>>
> >>> I'm unsure of the best scientific data to provide you in order to
> >>> troubleshoot this issue. Running the following
> >>>
> >>>     netstat -s |grep retransmitted
> >>>
> >>> shows a steady increase in retransmitted segments each time I list the
> >>> contents of a remote directory, for example, running 'ls' on a
> >>> directory containing 345 media files did the following using kernel
> >>> 4.19.18:
> >>>
> >>> increased retransmitted segments by 21 and the 'time' command showed
> >>> the following:
> >>>     real    0m19.867s
> >>>     user    0m0.012s
> >>>     sys    0m0.036s
> >>>
> >>> The same command shows no retransmitted segments running kernel
> >>> 4.18.16 and 'time' showed:
> >>>     real    0m0.300s
> >>>     user    0m0.004s
> >>>     sys    0m0.007s
> >>>
> >>> ifconfig does not show any RX/TX errors nor dropped packets in either case.
> >>>
> >>> dmesg XID:
> >>> [    2.979984] r8169 0000:03:00.0 eth0: RTL8168g/8111g,
> >>> f8:b1:56:fe:67:e0, XID 4c000800, IRQ 32
> >>>
> >>> # lspci -vv
> >>> 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
> >>> RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 0c)
> >>>     Subsystem: Dell RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller
> >>>     Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
> >>> ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
> >>>     Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort-
> >>> <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
> >>>     Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
> >>>     Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 19
> >>>     Region 0: I/O ports at d000 [size=256]
> >>>     Region 2: Memory at f7b00000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
> >>>     Region 4: Memory at f2100000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=16K]
> >>>     Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
> >>>         Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=375mA
> >>> PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+)
> >>>         Status: D0 NoSoftRst+ PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
> >>>     Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
> >>>         Address: 0000000000000000  Data: 0000
> >>>     Capabilities: [70] Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 01
> >>>         DevCap:    MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s
> >>> <512ns, L1 <64us
> >>>             ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset-
> >>> SlotPowerLimit 10.000W
> >>>         DevCtl:    CorrErr- NonFatalErr- FatalErr- UnsupReq-
> >>>             RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
> >>>             MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 4096 bytes
> >>>         DevSta:    CorrErr+ NonFatalErr- FatalErr- UnsupReq- AuxPwr+ TransPend-
> >>>         LnkCap:    Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s L1, Exit
> >>> Latency L0s unlimited, L1 <64us
> >>>             ClockPM+ Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot- ASPMOptComp+
> >>>         LnkCtl:    ASPM L1 Enabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- CommClk+
> >>>             ExtSynch- ClockPM+ AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
> >>>         LnkSta:    Speed 2.5GT/s (ok), Width x1 (ok)
> >>>             TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
> >>>         DevCap2: Completion Timeout: Range ABCD, TimeoutDis+, LTR+,
> >>> OBFF Via message/WAKE#
> >>>              AtomicOpsCap: 32bit- 64bit- 128bitCAS-
> >>>         DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis-, LTR+,
> >>> OBFF Disabled
> >>>              AtomicOpsCtl: ReqEn-
> >>>         LnkCtl2: Target Link Speed: 2.5GT/s, EnterCompliance- SpeedDis-
> >>>              Transmit Margin: Normal Operating Range,
> >>> EnterModifiedCompliance- ComplianceSOS-
> >>>              Compliance De-emphasis: -6dB
> >>>         LnkSta2: Current De-emphasis Level: -6dB,
> >>> EqualizationComplete-, EqualizationPhase1-
> >>>              EqualizationPhase2-, EqualizationPhase3-, LinkEqualizationRequest-
> >>>     Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=4 Masked-
> >>>         Vector table: BAR=4 offset=00000000
> >>>         PBA: BAR=4 offset=00000800
> >>>     Capabilities: [d0] Vital Product Data
> >>> pcilib: sysfs_read_vpd: read failed: Input/output error
> >>>         Not readable
> >>>     Capabilities: [100 v1] Advanced Error Reporting
> >>>         UESta:    DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt-
> >>> RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
> >>>         UEMsk:    DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt-
> >>> RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
> >>>         UESvrt:    DLP+ SDES+ TLP- FCP+ CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt-
> >>> RxOF+ MalfTLP+ ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
> >>>         CESta:    RxErr+ BadTLP+ BadDLLP+ Rollover- Timeout+ AdvNonFatalErr-
> >>>         CEMsk:    RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- AdvNonFatalErr+
> >>>         AERCap:    First Error Pointer: 00, ECRCGenCap+ ECRCGenEn-
> >>> ECRCChkCap+ ECRCChkEn-
> >>>             MultHdrRecCap- MultHdrRecEn- TLPPfxPres- HdrLogCap-
> >>>         HeaderLog: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> >>>     Capabilities: [140 v1] Virtual Channel
> >>>         Caps:    LPEVC=0 RefClk=100ns PATEntryBits=1
> >>>         Arb:    Fixed- WRR32- WRR64- WRR128-
> >>>         Ctrl:    ArbSelect=Fixed
> >>>         Status:    InProgress-
> >>>         VC0:    Caps:    PATOffset=00 MaxTimeSlots=1 RejSnoopTrans-
> >>>             Arb:    Fixed- WRR32- WRR64- WRR128- TWRR128- WRR256-
> >>>             Ctrl:    Enable+ ID=0 ArbSelect=Fixed TC/VC=01
> >>>             Status:    NegoPending- InProgress-
> >>>     Capabilities: [160 v1] Device Serial Number 01-00-00-00-68-4c-e0-00
> >>>     Capabilities: [170 v1] Latency Tolerance Reporting
> >>>         Max snoop latency: 71680ns
> >>>         Max no snoop latency: 71680ns
> >>>     Kernel driver in use: r8169
> >>>     Kernel modules: r8169
> >>>
> >>> Please let me know if you have any other ideas in terms of testing.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> Peter.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 05:28, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 28.01.2019 12:13, Peter Ceiley wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have been experiencing very poor network performance since Kernel
> >>>>> 4.19 and I'm confident it's related to the r8169 driver.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have no issue with kernel versions 4.18 and prior. I am experiencing
> >>>>> this issue in kernels 4.19 and 4.20 (currently running/testing with
> >>>>> 4.20.4 & 4.19.18).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If someone could guide me in the right direction, I'm happy to help
> >>>>> troubleshoot this issue. Note that I have been keeping an eye on one
> >>>>> issue related to loading of the PHY driver, however, my symptoms
> >>>>> differ in that I still have a network connection. I have attempted to
> >>>>> reload the driver on a running system, but this does not improve the
> >>>>> situation.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Using the proprietary r8168 driver returns my device to proper working order.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> lshw shows:
> >>>>>        description: Ethernet interface
> >>>>>        product: RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller
> >>>>>        vendor: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
> >>>>>        physical id: 0
> >>>>>        bus info: pci@...0:03:00.0
> >>>>>        logical name: enp3s0
> >>>>>        version: 0c
> >>>>>        serial:
> >>>>>        size: 1Gbit/s
> >>>>>        capacity: 1Gbit/s
> >>>>>        width: 64 bits
> >>>>>        clock: 33MHz
> >>>>>        capabilities: pm msi pciexpress msix vpd bus_master cap_list
> >>>>> ethernet physical tp aui bnc mii fibre 10bt 10bt-fd 100bt 100bt-fd
> >>>>> 1000bt-fd autonegotiation
> >>>>>        configuration: autonegotiation=on broadcast=yes driver=r8169
> >>>>> duplex=full firmware=rtl8168g-2_0.0.1 02/06/13 ip=192.168.1.25
> >>>>> latency=0 link=yes multicast=yes port=MII speed=1Gbit/s
> >>>>>        resources: irq:19 ioport:d000(size=256)
> >>>>> memory:f7b00000-f7b00fff memory:f2100000-f2103fff
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kind Regards,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Peter.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Hi Peter,
> >>>>
> >>>> the description "poor network performance" is quite vague, therefore:
> >>>>
> >>>> - Can you provide any measurements?
> >>>> - iperf results before and after
> >>>> - statistics about dropped packets (rx and/or tx)
> >>>> - Do you use jumbo packets?
> >>>>
> >>>> Also help would be a "lspci -vv" output for the network card and
> >>>> the dmesg output line with the chip XID.
> >>>>
> >>>> Heiner
> >>>
> >>
> >
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ