netdev - Re: [PATCH] ath10k: snoc: remove set but not used variable 'ar

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <878sz2l9la.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Jan 2019 12:32:17 +0200
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc:     YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: snoc: remove set but not used variable 'ar_snoc'

Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org> writes:

> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 9:53 PM YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com> wrote:
>>
>> ping...
>
> For some reason, your patch shows up as Deferred in patchwork:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10589789/
>
> So the maintainers have accidentally (?) ignored it.

Actually I put it deliberately to deferred as I wanted to apply Govind's
QMI patches first and only then this. But unfortunately the deferred
patches have been piled up by other patches so I haven't taken this
patch yet.

> I'm not what the official suggestion is for that, but you might just
> resend.

No need to resend, I can just change the state from Deferred to New. But
I see that the patch was already resent so I'll drop this version now.

-- 
Kalle Valo