netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 10/12] net: dsa: Wire up multicast IGMP snooping attribute notification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:32:17 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, idosch@...lanox.com, jiri@...lanox.com,
        ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org,
        roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 10/12] net: dsa: Wire up multicast IGMP
 snooping attribute notification

On 1/30/19 8:06 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 04:55:46PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> The bridge can at runtime be configured with or without IGMP snooping
>> enabled but we were not processing the switchdev attribute that notifies
>> about that toggle, do this now.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  include/net/dsa.h  |  2 ++
>>  net/dsa/dsa_priv.h | 11 +++++++++++
>>  net/dsa/port.c     | 13 +++++++++++++
>>  net/dsa/slave.c    |  4 ++++
>>  net/dsa/switch.c   | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  5 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/dsa.h b/include/net/dsa.h
>> index 7f2a668ef2cc..2ee1ede7df5c 100644
>> --- a/include/net/dsa.h
>> +++ b/include/net/dsa.h
>> @@ -425,6 +425,8 @@ struct dsa_switch_ops {
>>  	/*
>>  	 * Multicast database
>>  	 */
>> +	int	(*port_multicast_toggle)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
>> +					 bool mc_disabled);
> 
> 
> Hi Florin
> 
> Looks like there is an extra tab in there?

In the first or second line?
-- 
Florian