[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190130224638.GC30115@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 23:46:38 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, idosch@...lanox.com, jiri@...lanox.com,
ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org,
roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 10/12] net: dsa: Wire up multicast IGMP
snooping attribute notification
> @@ -425,6 +425,8 @@ struct dsa_switch_ops {
> /*
> * Multicast database
> */
> + int (*port_multicast_toggle)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> + bool mc_disabled);
> int (*port_mdb_prepare)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> const struct switchdev_obj_port_mdb *mdb);
> void (*port_mdb_add)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
Hi Florian
I took a second look at this, after you asked the question.
What i see above is that port_multicast_toggle is different to
port_mdb_prepare and port_mdb_add. From this context, it looks like
there should not be a tab between int and (*port_multicast_toggle).
However, when you look at the real file, it becomes clear that it is
actually normal to have a tab between the type and the name of the
function pointer, and that port_mdb_prepare and port_mdb_add are
different to the rest.
So you patch is O.K.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists