[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190130073656.GA22227@splinter>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:36:59 +0000
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"vivien.didelot@...il.com" <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
"ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org" <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
"ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org" <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>,
"roopa@...ulusnetworks.com" <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
"nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com" <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 01/12] net: bridge: multicast: Propagate
br_mc_disabled_update() return
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 04:55:37PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Some Ethernet switches might not be able to support disabling multicast
> flooding globally when e.g: several bridges span the same physical
> device, propagate the return value of br_mc_disabled_update() such that
> this propagates correctly to user-space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> ---
> net/bridge/br_multicast.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> index 3aeff0895669..aff5e003d34f 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> @@ -813,20 +813,22 @@ static void br_ip6_multicast_port_query_expired(struct timer_list *t)
> }
> #endif
>
> -static void br_mc_disabled_update(struct net_device *dev, bool value)
> +static int br_mc_disabled_update(struct net_device *dev, bool value)
> {
> struct switchdev_attr attr = {
> .orig_dev = dev,
> .id = SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_MC_DISABLED,
> - .flags = SWITCHDEV_F_DEFER,
> + .flags = SWITCHDEV_F_DEFER | SWITCHDEV_F_SKIP_EOPNOTSUPP,
Actually, since the operation is deferred I don't think the return value
from the driver is ever checked. Can you test it?
I think it would be good to convert the attributes to use the switchdev
notifier like commit d17d9f5e5143 ("switchdev: Replace port obj add/del
SDO with a notification") did for objects. Then you can have your
listener veto the operation in the same context it is happening.
> .u.mc_disabled = !value,
> };
>
> - switchdev_port_attr_set(dev, &attr);
> + return switchdev_port_attr_set(dev, &attr);
> }
>
> int br_multicast_add_port(struct net_bridge_port *port)
> {
> + int ret;
> +
> port->multicast_router = MDB_RTR_TYPE_TEMP_QUERY;
>
> timer_setup(&port->multicast_router_timer,
> @@ -837,8 +839,11 @@ int br_multicast_add_port(struct net_bridge_port *port)
> timer_setup(&port->ip6_own_query.timer,
> br_ip6_multicast_port_query_expired, 0);
> #endif
> - br_mc_disabled_update(port->dev,
> - br_opt_get(port->br, BROPT_MULTICAST_ENABLED));
> + ret = br_mc_disabled_update(port->dev,
> + br_opt_get(port->br,
> + BROPT_MULTICAST_ENABLED));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> port->mcast_stats = netdev_alloc_pcpu_stats(struct bridge_mcast_stats);
> if (!port->mcast_stats)
> @@ -1937,12 +1942,16 @@ static void br_multicast_start_querier(struct net_bridge *br,
> int br_multicast_toggle(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long val)
> {
> struct net_bridge_port *port;
> + int err = 0;
>
> spin_lock_bh(&br->multicast_lock);
> if (!!br_opt_get(br, BROPT_MULTICAST_ENABLED) == !!val)
> goto unlock;
>
> - br_mc_disabled_update(br->dev, val);
> + err = br_mc_disabled_update(br->dev, val);
> + if (err)
> + goto unlock;
> +
> br_opt_toggle(br, BROPT_MULTICAST_ENABLED, !!val);
> if (!br_opt_get(br, BROPT_MULTICAST_ENABLED))
> goto unlock;
> @@ -1957,7 +1966,7 @@ int br_multicast_toggle(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long val)
> unlock:
> spin_unlock_bh(&br->multicast_lock);
>
> - return 0;
> + return err;
> }
>
> bool br_multicast_enabled(const struct net_device *dev)
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists