[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190130194608.GB28098@t480s.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 19:46:08 -0500
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Save switch rules
Hi Miquèl,
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 10:46:06 +0100, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
> > > > Today, there is no S2RAM support for switches. First, I proposed to add
> > > > suspend/resume callbacks to the mv88e6xxx driver - just enough to avoid
> > > > crashing the kernel.
> > >
> > > Then i would suggest the mv88e6xxx refuses the suspend. Actually that
> > > probably is the first correct step. We don't have suspend support, so
> > > stop the suspend happening, so preventing the kernel crash.
Actually can you show me the crash that is happening?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists