netdev - Re: [ethtool 1/6] ethtool: move option parsing related code into function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 30 Jan 2019 22:30:38 -0800
From:   Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:     "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
        Nicholas Nunley <nicholas.d.nunley@...el.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [ethtool 1/6] ethtool: move option parsing related code into
 function

On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 16:08 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 03:03:08PM -0800, Nicholas Nunley wrote:
> > Move option parsing code into find_option function.
> > 
> > No behavior changes.
> > 
> > Based on patch by Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Nunley <nicholas.d.nunley@...el.com>
> 
> Well, after looking at this series for a while I had decided to apply it.
> But when I applied it and did a 'make distcheck', I got this:
> 
> ...
> 
> gcc -DTEST_ETHTOOL -g -O2   -o test-features test_features-test-
> features.o test_features-test-common.o test_features-ethtool.o
> test_features-rxclass.o test_features-amd8111e.o test_features-de2104x.o
> test_features-dsa.o test_features-e100.o test_features-e1000.o
> test_features-et131x.o test_features-igb.o test_features-fec_8xx.o
> test_features-ibm_emac.o test_features-ixgb.o test_features-ixgbe.o
> test_features-natsemi.o test_features-pcnet32.o test_features-realtek.o
> test_features-tg3.o test_features-marvell.o test_features-vioc.o
> test_features-smsc911x.o test_features-at76c50x-usb.o test_features-sfc.o 
> test_features-stmmac.o test_features-sff-common.o test_features-sfpid.o
> test_features-sfpdiag.o test_features-ixgbevf.o test_features-tse.o
> test_features-vmxnet3.o test_features-qsfp.o test_features-fjes.o
> test_features-lan78xx.o -lm 
> make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/linville/git/ethtool/ethtool-
> 4.19/_build/sub'
> make  check-TESTS
> make[2]: Entering directory '/home/linville/git/ethtool/ethtool-
> 4.19/_build/sub'
> make[3]: Entering directory '/home/linville/git/ethtool/ethtool-
> 4.19/_build/sub'
> FAIL: test-cmdline
> PASS: test-features
> =========================================================================
> ===
> Testsuite summary for ethtool 4.19
> =========================================================================
> ===
> # TOTAL: 2
> # PASS:  1
> # SKIP:  0
> # XFAIL: 0
> # FAIL:  1
> # XPASS: 0
> # ERROR: 0
> =========================================================================
> ===
> See ./test-suite.log
> Please report to netdev@...r.kernel.org
> =========================================================================
> ===
> make[3]: *** [Makefile:1942: test-suite.log] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/linville/git/ethtool/ethtool-
> 4.19/_build/sub'
> make[2]: *** [Makefile:2050: check-TESTS] Error 2
> make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/linville/git/ethtool/ethtool-
> 4.19/_build/sub'
> make[1]: *** [Makefile:2264: check-am] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/linville/git/ethtool/ethtool-
> 4.19/_build/sub'
> make: *** [Makefile:2186: distcheck] Error 1
> 
> ...
> 
> I'll attach ./ethtool-4.19/_build/sub/test-suite.log to this
> message. Obviously we need whatever additional changes are needed to
> get 'make check-TESTS' to pass legitimately.

Interesting that we did not see this in testing.  I will work with Nick to
provide an updated patch, resolves your distcheck failure.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)