| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190201070401.4148822-1-kafai@fb.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 23:04:01 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, <kernel-team@...com>,
Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 5/6] bpf: Add skb->sk, bpf_sk_fullsock and bpf_tcp_sock tests to test_verifer
This patch tests accessing the skb->sk and the new helpers,
bpf_sk_fullsock and bpf_tcp_sock.
The errstr of some existing "reference tracking" tests is changed
with s/bpf_sock/sock/ and s/socket/sock/ where "sock" is from the
verifier's reg_type_str[].
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c | 4 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sock.c | 238 ++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 241 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sock.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c
index dc2cc823df2b..3ed3593bd8b6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
- .errstr = "cannot write into socket",
+ .errstr = "cannot write into sock",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -562,7 +562,7 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_sock access off=0 size=8",
+ .errstr = "invalid sock access off=0 size=8",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sock.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a01ea3bc1c54
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sock.c
@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
+{
+ "skb->sk: no NULL check",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "invalid mem access 'sock_common_or_null'",
+},
+{
+ "skb->sk: sk->family [non fullsock field]",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct bpf_sock, family)),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+},
+{
+ "skb->sk: sk->type [fullsock field]",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct bpf_sock, type)),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "invalid sock_common access",
+},
+{
+ "bpf_sk_fullsock(skb->sk): no !skb->sk check",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_fullsock),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "type=sock_common_or_null expected=sock_common",
+},
+{
+ "sk_fullsock(skb->sk): no NULL check on ret",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_fullsock),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct bpf_sock, type)),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "invalid mem access 'sock_or_null'",
+},
+{
+ "sk_fullsock(skb->sk): sk->type [fullsock field]",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_fullsock),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct bpf_sock, type)),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+},
+{
+ "sk_fullsock(skb->sk): sk->family [non fullsock field]",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_fullsock),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct bpf_sock, family)),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+},
+{
+ "bpf_tcp_sock(skb->sk): no !skb->sk check",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_tcp_sock),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "type=sock_common_or_null expected=sock_common",
+},
+{
+ "bpf_tcp_sock(skb->sk): no NULL check on ret",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_tcp_sock),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct bpf_tcp_sock, snd_cwnd)),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "invalid mem access 'tcp_sock_or_null'",
+},
+{
+ "bpf_tcp_sock(skb->sk): sk->snd_cwnd",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_tcp_sock),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct bpf_tcp_sock, snd_cwnd)),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+},
+{
+ "bpf_tcp_sock(skb->sk): sk->bytes_acked",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_tcp_sock),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct bpf_tcp_sock, bytes_acked)),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+},
+{
+ "bpf_tcp_sock(bpf_sk_fullsock(skb->sk)): tp->snd_cwnd",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_fullsock),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_tcp_sock),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct bpf_tcp_sock, snd_cwnd)),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+},
+{
+ "bpf_sk_release(skb->sk)",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_release),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "type=sock_common expected=sock",
+},
+{
+ "bpf_sk_release(bpf_sk_fullsock(skb->sk))",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_fullsock),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_release),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "reference has not been acquired before",
+},
+{
+ "bpf_sk_release(bpf_tcp_sock(skb->sk))",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_tcp_sock),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_release),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "type=tcp_sock expected=sock",
+},
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c
index dca58cf1a4ab..0013847993a8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@
},
.result = REJECT,
//.errstr = "same insn cannot be used with different pointers",
- .errstr = "cannot write into socket",
+ .errstr = "cannot write into sock",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
{
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists