[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 15:41:21 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Dmitry Tarnyagin <dmitry.tarnyagin@...kless.no>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] dmaengine: imx-sdma: pass struct device to DMA API
functions
On 01-02-19, 09:47, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The DMA API generally relies on a struct device to work properly, and
> only barely works without one for legacy reasons. Pass the easily
> available struct device from the platform_device to remedy this.
This looks good to me but fails to apply. Can you please base it on
dmaengine-next or linux-next please and resend
Thanks
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists