lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 4 Feb 2019 16:58:17 -0500
From:   netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org
To:     unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)

I think is
  missing is the "io-reserve=0" property from the domain configuration
  (for the "pcie-root-port" devices), which we introduced for
  <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344299>.

In fact, in <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344299#c24>,
Marcel recommended e1000e for testing the new property.

Unfortunately, I'm unaware of any libvirt domain XML exposure of the
"pcie-root-port.io-reserve" (and other similar) resource reservation
properties.

I'll go ahead and reference those older BZs in the new one now.

Thanks!
Laszlo

>From INBOX@...hat  Mon Feb  4 15:57:49 2019
Return-Path: eng-net-virt-staff-bounces@...hat.com
Received: from mail.corp.redhat.com [10.4.203.66]
	by tuck.redhat.com with IMAP (fetchmail-6.3.26 polling redhat account mtsirkin)
	for <mst@...alhost> (single-drop); Mon, 04 Feb 2019 15:57:49 -0500 (EST

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ