netdev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <S1726348AbfBDV6R/20190204215817Z+1195@vger.kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 4 Feb 2019 16:58:17 -0500
From:   netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org
To:     unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)

I think is
  missing is the "io-reserve=0" property from the domain configuration
  (for the "pcie-root-port" devices), which we introduced for
  <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344299>.

In fact, in <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344299#c24>,
Marcel recommended e1000e for testing the new property.

Unfortunately, I'm unaware of any libvirt domain XML exposure of the
"pcie-root-port.io-reserve" (and other similar) resource reservation
properties.

I'll go ahead and reference those older BZs in the new one now.

Thanks!
Laszlo

>From INBOX@...hat  Mon Feb  4 15:57:49 2019
Return-Path: eng-net-virt-staff-bounces@...hat.com
Received: from mail.corp.redhat.com [10.4.203.66]
	by tuck.redhat.com with IMAP (fetchmail-6.3.26 polling redhat account mtsirkin)
	for <mst@...alhost> (single-drop); Mon, 04 Feb 2019 15:57:49 -0500 (EST