Message-ID: <20190204152339.GD2118@nanopsycho>
Date:   Mon, 4 Feb 2019 16:23:39 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 01/16] net: sched: protect block state with
 mutex

Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 01:32:46PM CET, vladbu@...lanox.com wrote:
>Currently, tcf_block doesn't use any synchronization mechanisms to protect
>critical sections that manage lifetime of its chains. block->chain_list and
>multiple variables in tcf_chain that control its lifetime assume external
>synchronization provided by global rtnl lock. Converting chain reference
>counting to atomic reference counters is not possible because cls API uses
>multiple counters and flags to control chain lifetime, so all of them must
>be synchronized in chain get/put code.
>
>Use single per-block lock to protect block data and manage lifetime of all
>chains on the block. Always take block->lock when accessing chain_list.
>Chain get and put modify chain lifetime-management data and parent block's
>chain_list, so take the lock in these functions. Verify block->lock state
>with assertions in functions that expect to be called with the lock taken
>and are called from multiple places. Take block->lock when accessing
>filter_chain_list.
>
>In order to allow parallel update of rules on single block, move all calls
>to classifiers outside of critical sections protected by new block->lock.
>Rearrange chain get and put functions code to only access protected chain
>data while holding block lock:
>- Check if chain was explicitly created inside put function while holding
>  block lock. Add additional argument to __tcf_chain_put() to only put
>  explicitly created chain.
>- Rearrange code to only access chain reference counter and chain action
>  reference counter while holding block lock.
>- Extract code that requires block->lock from tcf_chain_destroy() into
>  standalone tcf_chain_destroy() function that is called by
>  __tcf_chain_put() in same critical section that changes chain reference
>  counters.
>
>Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
>---
>
>Changes from V2 to V3:
>  - Change block->lock type to mutex.
>  - Implement tcf_block_destroy() helper function that destroys
>    block->lock mutex before deallocating the block.
>  - Revert GFP_KERNEL->GFP_ATOMIC memory allocation flags of tcf_chain
>    which is no longer needed after block->lock type change.
>
> include/net/sch_generic.h |   5 +++
> net/sched/cls_api.c       | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/net/sch_generic.h b/include/net/sch_generic.h
>index 7a4957599874..31b8ea66a47d 100644
>--- a/include/net/sch_generic.h
>+++ b/include/net/sch_generic.h
>@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include <linux/list.h>
> #include <linux/refcount.h>
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>+#include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <net/gen_stats.h>
> #include <net/rtnetlink.h>
> 
>@@ -352,6 +353,10 @@ struct tcf_chain {
> };
> 
> struct tcf_block {
>+	/* Lock protects tcf_block and lifetime-management data of chains
>+	 * attached to the block (refcnt, action_refcnt, explicitly_created).
>+	 */
>+	struct mutex lock;
> 	struct list_head chain_list;
> 	u32 index; /* block index for shared blocks */
> 	refcount_t refcnt;
>diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
>index e2b5cb2eb34e..cc416b6a3aa2 100644
>--- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
>+++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
>@@ -193,6 +193,9 @@ static void tcf_proto_destroy(struct tcf_proto *tp,
> 	kfree_rcu(tp, rcu);
> }
> 
>+#define ASSERT_BLOCK_LOCKED(block)					\
>+	lockdep_assert_held(&(block)->lock)
>+
> struct tcf_filter_chain_list_item {
> 	struct list_head list;
> 	tcf_chain_head_change_t *chain_head_change;
>@@ -204,6 +207,8 @@ static struct tcf_chain *tcf_chain_create(struct tcf_block *block,
> {
> 	struct tcf_chain *chain;
> 
>+	ASSERT_BLOCK_LOCKED(block);
>+
> 	chain = kzalloc(sizeof(*chain), GFP_KERNEL);
> 	if (!chain)
> 		return NULL;
>@@ -235,25 +240,51 @@ static void tcf_chain0_head_change(struct tcf_chain *chain,
> 		tcf_chain_head_change_item(item, tp_head);
> }
> 
>-static void tcf_chain_destroy(struct tcf_chain *chain)
>+/* Returns true if block can be safely freed. */
>+
>+static bool tcf_chain_detach(struct tcf_chain *chain)
> {
> 	struct tcf_block *block = chain->block;
> 
>+	ASSERT_BLOCK_LOCKED(block);
>+
> 	list_del(&chain->list);
> 	if (!chain->index)
> 		block->chain0.chain = NULL;
>+
>+	if (list_empty(&block->chain_list) &&
>+	    refcount_read(&block->refcnt) == 0)
>+		return true;
>+
>+	return false;
>+}
>+
>+static void tcf_block_destroy(struct tcf_block *block)
>+{
>+	mutex_destroy(&block->lock);
>+	kfree_rcu(block, rcu);
>+}
>+
>+static void tcf_chain_destroy(struct tcf_chain *chain, bool free_block)
>+{
>+	struct tcf_block *block = chain->block;
>+
> 	kfree(chain);
>-	if (list_empty(&block->chain_list) && !refcount_read(&block->refcnt))
>-		kfree_rcu(block, rcu);
>+	if (free_block)
>+		tcf_block_destroy(block);
> }
> 
> static void tcf_chain_hold(struct tcf_chain *chain)
> {
>+	ASSERT_BLOCK_LOCKED(chain->block);
>+
> 	++chain->refcnt;
> }
> 
> static bool tcf_chain_held_by_acts_only(struct tcf_chain *chain)
> {
>+	ASSERT_BLOCK_LOCKED(chain->block);
>+
> 	/* In case all the references are action references, this
> 	 * chain should not be shown to the user.
> 	 */
>@@ -265,6 +296,8 @@ static struct tcf_chain *tcf_chain_lookup(struct tcf_block *block,
> {
> 	struct tcf_chain *chain;
> 
>+	ASSERT_BLOCK_LOCKED(block);
>+
> 	list_for_each_entry(chain, &block->chain_list, list) {
> 		if (chain->index == chain_index)
> 			return chain;
>@@ -279,31 +312,40 @@ static struct tcf_chain *__tcf_chain_get(struct tcf_block *block,
> 					 u32 chain_index, bool create,
> 					 bool by_act)
> {
>-	struct tcf_chain *chain = tcf_chain_lookup(block, chain_index);
>+	struct tcf_chain *chain = NULL;
>+	bool is_first_reference;
> 
>+	mutex_lock(&block->lock);
>+	chain = tcf_chain_lookup(block, chain_index);
> 	if (chain) {
> 		tcf_chain_hold(chain);
> 	} else {
> 		if (!create)
>-			return NULL;
>+			goto errout;
> 		chain = tcf_chain_create(block, chain_index);
> 		if (!chain)
>-			return NULL;
>+			goto errout;
> 	}
> 
> 	if (by_act)
> 		++chain->action_refcnt;
>+	is_first_reference = chain->refcnt - chain->action_refcnt == 1;
>+	mutex_unlock(&block->lock);
> 
> 	/* Send notification only in case we got the first
> 	 * non-action reference. Until then, the chain acts only as
> 	 * a placeholder for actions pointing to it and user ought
> 	 * not know about them.
> 	 */
>-	if (chain->refcnt - chain->action_refcnt == 1 && !by_act)
>+	if (is_first_reference && !by_act)
> 		tc_chain_notify(chain, NULL, 0, NLM_F_CREATE | NLM_F_EXCL,
> 				RTM_NEWCHAIN, false);
> 
> 	return chain;
>+
>+errout:
>+	mutex_unlock(&block->lock);
>+	return chain;
> }
> 
> static struct tcf_chain *tcf_chain_get(struct tcf_block *block, u32 chain_index,
>@@ -320,37 +362,59 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcf_chain_get_by_act);
> 
> static void tc_chain_tmplt_del(struct tcf_chain *chain);
> 
>-static void __tcf_chain_put(struct tcf_chain *chain, bool by_act)
>+static void __tcf_chain_put(struct tcf_chain *chain, bool by_act,
>+			    bool explicitly_created)
> {
>+	struct tcf_block *block = chain->block;
>+	bool is_last, free_block = false;
>+	unsigned int refcnt;
>+
>+	mutex_lock(&block->lock);
>+	if (explicitly_created) {
>+		if (!chain->explicitly_created) {
>+			mutex_unlock(&block->lock);
>+			return;
>+		}
>+		chain->explicitly_created = false;

Hmm, I think that you left "chain->explicitly_created = false" at the
original location (tc_ctl_chain()). I think it would be better to do
the chain->explicitly_created management move in a separate patch.


>+	}
>+
> 	if (by_act)
> 		chain->action_refcnt--;
>-	chain->refcnt--;
>+
>+	/* tc_chain_notify_delete can't be called while holding block lock.
>+	 * However, when block is unlocked chain can be changed concurrently, so
>+	 * save these to temporary variables.
>+	 */
>+	refcnt = --chain->refcnt;
>+	is_last = refcnt - chain->action_refcnt == 0;
>+	if (refcnt == 0)
>+		free_block = tcf_chain_detach(chain);
>+	mutex_unlock(&block->lock);
> 
> 	/* The last dropped non-action reference will trigger notification. */
>-	if (chain->refcnt - chain->action_refcnt == 0 && !by_act)
>+	if (is_last && !by_act)
> 		tc_chain_notify(chain, NULL, 0, 0, RTM_DELCHAIN, false);
> 
>-	if (chain->refcnt == 0) {
>+	if (refcnt == 0) {
> 		tc_chain_tmplt_del(chain);
>-		tcf_chain_destroy(chain);
>+		tcf_chain_destroy(chain, free_block);
> 	}
> }
> 
> static void tcf_chain_put(struct tcf_chain *chain)
> {
>-	__tcf_chain_put(chain, false);
>+	__tcf_chain_put(chain, false, false);
> }
> 
> void tcf_chain_put_by_act(struct tcf_chain *chain)
> {
>-	__tcf_chain_put(chain, true);
>+	__tcf_chain_put(chain, true, false);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcf_chain_put_by_act);
> 
> static void tcf_chain_put_explicitly_created(struct tcf_chain *chain)
> {
>-	if (chain->explicitly_created)
>-		tcf_chain_put(chain);
>+	__tcf_chain_put(chain, false, true);
> }
> 
> static void tcf_chain_flush(struct tcf_chain *chain)
>@@ -764,6 +828,7 @@ static struct tcf_block *tcf_block_create(struct net *net, struct Qdisc *q,
> 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Memory allocation for block failed");
> 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> 	}
>+	mutex_init(&block->lock);
> 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&block->chain_list);
> 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&block->cb_list);
> 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&block->owner_list);
>@@ -827,7 +892,7 @@ static void tcf_block_put_all_chains(struct tcf_block *block)
> static void __tcf_block_put(struct tcf_block *block, struct Qdisc *q,
> 			    struct tcf_block_ext_info *ei)
> {
>-	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&block->refcnt)) {
>+	if (refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock(&block->refcnt, &block->lock)) {
> 		/* Flushing/putting all chains will cause the block to be
> 		 * deallocated when last chain is freed. However, if chain_list
> 		 * is empty, block has to be manually deallocated. After block
>@@ -836,6 +901,7 @@ static void __tcf_block_put(struct tcf_block *block, struct Qdisc *q,
> 		 */
> 		bool free_block = list_empty(&block->chain_list);
> 
>+		mutex_unlock(&block->lock);
> 		if (tcf_block_shared(block))
> 			tcf_block_remove(block, block->net);
> 		if (!free_block)
>@@ -845,7 +911,7 @@ static void __tcf_block_put(struct tcf_block *block, struct Qdisc *q,
> 			tcf_block_offload_unbind(block, q, ei);
> 
> 		if (free_block)
>-			kfree_rcu(block, rcu);
>+			tcf_block_destroy(block);
> 		else
> 			tcf_block_put_all_chains(block);
> 	} else if (q) {
>-- 
>2.13.6
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists